Besides not clearing up this up for me, could 'monotheism' be some thing like your One, or Unified?
This is perfectly fine with me.PeteJ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:23 pmI would prefer 'The Self' and not 'Thy'. It's not as if there's more than one.This is very true and correct, in a sense. But, there a words like 'persons', 'selfs', et cetera, and so when ALL of these 'things' are identified and defined properly and correctly, then along with this comes the Knowing of Thy 'Self'.
Also, I use the word 'thy' in 'thyself' because it actually means, to me, Its (own) Self or One's Self, (like the phrase 'the Self' does) and unlike the words 'myself' and/or 'yourself' do NOT.
Also, when I talk about the One and ONLY Self I usually refer to It as thee Self, to reinforce that the 'the' is is 'thee' One and ONLY.
But it is just an 'analogy', and not thee actual True and Right answer, correct?PeteJ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:23 pmNo argument from me.'Knowing Thyself' brings with it the FULL Knowing and Understanding of ALL these apparent "things", which human beings have put names to and labeled.
Hmm I thought it was a good answer.
How did you MISS the part when and where I said, 'in a UNIFIED manner with and by EVERY one'?PeteJ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:23 pmBut only you would know, so why would anyone else by joyous? .Unity with God, or union with Reality, may be the EXACT SAME thing. But, recognizing and accepting, or KNOWING what Reality, or God, Truly IS in a UNIFIED manner with and by EVERY one, EQUALLY, would be a MORE joyous and happier occasion for EVERY one, correct?
This means that if, and when, recognizing and accepting is UNIFIED among ALL, then EVERY one will be joyous, as One.
Although there is NO actual separate thing, there are appearances of separate and individual 'things' like separate and individual human beings or persons, correct?
If so, then these "other" human beings, or persons, would be some one "else", who is joyous.
Also, whenever I use the words "others" or any one "else", in reference to human beings, or people, in this forum, then I use the double air or double quotation marks to represent that these 'things' are NOT actual real 'things' but are just appearances.
This can be CLEARLY SEEN in my past writings, here, in this forum.
But which ones of these human beings are real and actual "ones" that has and already KNOWS the answers?PeteJ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:23 pmQuite so,Well when a 'you' Knows 'God', FULLY and CORRECTLY, then what is recognized and realized is that God, Itself, is CERTAINY NOT the human being anthropomorphized, and gendered, word, nor concept, of a "he".
Because this is the case.By the way knowing some thing, and then being that thing, can be two completely different things. Why do you speak as though these, so called, "mystics", and/or "mysticism", has, and already, KNOWS the answers?
Also, when you say they do, then do you mean that each one has and already KNOWS ALL the answers, or just some of the answers?
So, when you use the word 'mysticism', then what do you actually mean?
So, do you claim that 'you' ALREADY KNOW the answers?
But WHY would 'you' want to finish now?
Is there some thing that you do NOT want REVEALED?