Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 3:01 pm
gaffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:03 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 12:08 am
Genesis obviously does. It tells us what animals were created for.
ok tell me more.
What interests you?
many things, since you have asked an honest question shall answer.
in order of importance? or not? - not sure - some days the order does shift. so lets go with a simple list of no order.
becoming wise - or at least more wise than i am today. i.e. wiser than i am now.
living a contented life, maybe not happy nor fullfilled (those are both bars higher than the contentment - I would be happy enough with the lower bar contentment - if i find happyness and fullfillment also, well great!
Religious Dogmas. from Eastern to Western Religions.
-religious dogma and politics both tie into history, so all three are in a way of the same nature - i have an interest in all three. esp the evolution of Religous Dogma via history. - first Judaism was polytheistic, then finally - via denial of prior Gods they affirmed pror to the destruction of the 1st Temple, evolved (via politics of the time - return from exile via Ezra - post 587 BC) to "no other Gods but YHWH, after the Persians allowed Ezra and Zak to emigrate to Judea.
Gardening - siting out on my back porch, and growing food in the yard, connects me with the Earth, and is my primary form of Meditatation.
Computers, self learned PCs from the early 90's - including Linux slackware 2.0, and OS/2 Warp (best OS EVER! - at least "EVER via early 90's" - but IBM was an idiot and did not promote the better alternative to Wondoze, so "if you don't promote, you become remote" (to reference what's his name in the OJ trial (OJ of course killed his wife, and Ferman/or whomever was there - likely planted the clove (the concept of guilt is not tied to cops rigging the crime scene) - OJ killed his wife, the cops planted evidence - both wrong, of course the former is the greater wrong.) - and no the jury verdict was not jury nullification, for it to be that then the charge Murder, would be the question to the jury, that jury just suffered from binary thinking, they thought the police planted evidence (I do to BTW - 75/25), but being dumb equated that with OJ is innocent!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO! - I'm not dumb, cops planted evidence because they acted as the jury at the time, then planted the "Evidence" to secure a conviction, but it backfired! due to Juries binary thinking- and Vore Dire (which should be illegal) - = jury tampering = sheep = dumbshits on the jury.
should be no vore dire, and just a random draw of neighers for all court cases.
ok, kinda drunk now, and forget the point of your post and am rambaling. let me have 4 more beers and a few more hours to reply to the rest of your post.
BTW you have a mind and a heart and so not "veg" - and so you and i have no problem with agreeing or dissagreeing, and even welcome the latter, when later in life one refects upon the point and concurs. - this had happened to me via the now log dead forum bible-discussions, where at the time i was wrong, but sure i was write, then an other poster provided a point i never considered.
i miss that forum, many good and wise folks we lost when that forum went dark in 2017.
-let me drink some more, before i reply to the rest of your reply to me.
thanks for reply BTW!