But, if you only judge your books by their covers, or judge the words you see on your own first impression, and NEVER look into them NOR CLARIFY, then you will HOLD what you first believe is true.
IF, and WHEN, you EVER point out what I actually doing, then I will FACE IT.
'you' are the one who does NOT look at and face what you do.
But what you are 'trying to' point out about me is NOT what I am actually doing but rather what you PERCEIVE I am doing, which, to be completely frank AND Honest, may well be two completely different and/or opposing things.
And, as I keep pointing out, people on this forum do NOT clarify with me BEFORE they make assumptions and jump to conclusions.
I have also pointed out that I write in very specific ways, for very specific reasons.
If you BELIEVE my claims are an absurdity, then GREAT. This is the response that I sometimes want from people in this forum. This is CLEAR EVIDENCE and PROOF just how quickly the brain will close off the OPEN Mind and jump to illogical conclusions, almost immediately. Without even once contemplating whether it would be better to just CLARIFY that, whatever conclusion that it has jumped to, is right or not.
As I have stated numerous times already, I can back up and support my views and claims. But, unfortunately, I have yet to get tested on my ACTUAL views and ACTUAL claims. What most people do here, in this forum, is exactly what you are doing here now in this thread, that is; ASSUMING I am saying and meaning some thing, jumping to a CONCLUSION that your ASSUMPTION is true, right, and correct, and then BELIEVING that what you SEE and UNDERSTAND is absolutely true, right, and correct.
GREAT. If that is what you ASSUME, have CONCLUDED, and BELIEVE is true and right, then that is PERFECT, for me. But, as I have continually suggested, if you want to make a claim, then I suggest that you have at least some thing to back up and support your claims BEFORE you make the actual claim. So, in saying that, how about you find and pick what you claim is my first, supposed, "absurdity", then 'try to' PROVE that you way you have perceived it is how it is EXACTLY what I was saying and actually meaning, and then 'try to' PROVE with sound, logical reasoning how what I am ACTUALLY meaning is an "absurdity".
Some might suggest that you just prove your claims.
If you want to continually make claims, then I suggest you prove them to be true, especially considering the forum that we are in here, now.
Some have already SEEN the actual EVIDENCE and PROOF of this in your very own writings, about 'you'.
I have explored this quite often, and I KNOW exactly what I am doing, and WHY I am doing it here, in this forum.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:59 amNo, it is the response of someone who has already seen you continually demonstrate being a noisy fraud. There's no reason to keep going down that path with you. You are clearly addicted to going in endless self-absorbed circles of your thoughts, assumptions, and projections. It would be more interesting if you explored/discussed why you do that.
Is this the absolutely, without doubt, irrefutable CERTAIN Truth?
Or, are 'you' at all somewhat open at all to LOOKING INTO this, and then DISCUSSING this?
If it is the former one, then as someone claims in another thread, then it is 'you' who is NOT the sane person.