Well, You couldn't be any more wrong in that assumption if you tried, and is why you are totally clueless to think that there is a 'someone' to whom quiescence can be an experience for. But I'm not going to bother arguing this misguided belief with you, you either understand ..there is no 'someone' who experiences any such state as a sense of 'well being' or of a 'passive sensation' or you don't understand.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:19 pmWell, we certainly agree on that, B. In fact, it's not really good for anything except creating passivity and a delusion of well-being where none is actually to be had.
The truth is,you either get that truth, or you don't. It's your imagined belief, not mine.