Proof that God IS ..in 6 words.

[Walker]

Can't God change rules of physics?

I don't know.

.

Some physics restrictions could be delusions.

[Greta]

And then the "gods" hit Enter

Memes are as real as genes.

[Walker]

So let it be written. So …

[Reflex]

Proof in as few as two words and people still can’t grasp it. Proof is easy, but it is also useless to all but an open mind.

[Dontaskme]

The word "I" is recursive/self-referential.
You compute therefore you are (Descartes was SO close)

I have thoughts therefore I have an ego.

There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking
makes it so.

.

[Dontaskme]

Proof in as few as two words and people still can’t grasp it. Proof is easy, but it is also useless to all but an open mind.

True.

I AM = irrefutable truth.

I AM this? = lie/ a belief.

.

[Dontaskme]

Existence does not require a believer.

A believer is that which separates you from the truth ... Words are no more than signposts.

.

[Dontaskme]

Devoid of doctrine or religious belief systems, the pristine essence of all Truth is revealed in it's purity with unprecedented clarity. It becomes clear that to truly ''know'' is to ''be''rather than to ''know about.'' Silence speaks a thousand words. Silence speaks the loudest.

.

[TimeSeeker]

I have thoughts therefore I have an ego.

There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking
makes it so.

I am not passing any moral judgment. I don’t believe in objective morality.

How are thoughts different to ego? Said differently: suppose you had thoughts but no ego what difference would I observe?

Is your possession of an ego a falsifiable belief? w.g could you be mistaken, and if so what observation would convince you of your error?

[Dontaskme]

I have thoughts therefore I have an ego.

There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking
makes it so.

I am not passing any moral judgment. I don’t believe in objective morality.

How are thoughts different to ego? Said differently: suppose you had thoughts but no ego what difference would I observe?

Is your possession of an ego a falsifiable belief? w.g could you be mistaken, and if so what observation would convince you of your error?

The I AM isn't a thought. It doesn't require thought to be, it's the thoughtless, stateless, unborn state prior to knowledge.

Knowledge is of the mind, it's ego.



.

[TimeSeeker]

The I AM isn't a thought. It doesn't require thought to be, it's the thoughtless, stateless, unborn state prior to knowledge.

Knowledge is aof the mind, it's ego.

I don't have any knowledge though? I have a bunch of theories and a bunch of mental models.

They help me make predictions.

[TimeSeeker]

The I AM isn't a thought. It doesn't require thought to be, it's the thoughtless, stateless, unborn state prior to knowledge.

But you typed the "I am". And I am sure you can't operate your muscles without thought/mind/brain/<whatever you want to call it>

[SpheresOfBalance]

One must be first before other.

.

Nope that's just possible proof that your mind is closed and/or that it's warped.

[Dontaskme]

The I AM isn't a thought. It doesn't require thought to be, it's the thoughtless, stateless, unborn state prior to knowledge.

But you typed the "I am". And I am sure you can't operate your muscles without thought/mind/brain/<whatever you want to call it>

No conceptual thing known is typing, typing is just happening spontaneoulsy.

Similarly no conceptual thing known is growing the grass, or growing the human baby from one cell into millions of cells.

Creation is of the mind, an intelligent rational mind that knows. That mind is not human. But the human has somehow hijacked it and claimed it...that's the ego.

.

[TimeSeeker]

That mind is not human. But the human has somehow hijacked it and claimed it...that's the ego.

Heh. I don't even know what an "human" is. I mean - I know it's a label we've slapped on each other, but I don't understand the essence of humanity.

I reserve judgment about the mind. I have no idea how it works...