Is the concept of ''Concept'' necessary, let alone real?

[Dontaskme]

The kingdom of God comes not with observation. Observation and the Observed THING of this Observing are the same ONE action.

Self-concept itself is a phenomenal experience,grasping itself is a phenomenal experience,subject to impermanence,empty in nature,while the transcendent luminous presence is ever-present.

Self-concept is not what Being IS, by trying to be, you have made being into a concept.Self-concept and it's functioning as desire have already been born.

No Self-concept is required for Being. You make up such phenomena, phenomena comes and goes, BEING remain. Thank God, it is not the other way around.

.

[Eodnhoj7]

Concept, at the ideological level, are merely boundaries which give structure through structure as structure. All reality is composed of structure, hence all structure is in itself real under the premise it is an extension of reality.

[Dontaskme]

Concept, at the ideological level, are merely boundaries which give structure through structure as structure. All reality is composed of structure, hence all structure is in itself real under the premise it is an extension of reality.

Yes, I agree.

Although not essentially necessary except on a human level, from the mind's perspective.

.

''There is a voice that doesn't use words. Listen. '' ~ Rumi

[Eodnhoj7]

Concept, at the ideological level, are merely boundaries which give structure through structure as structure. All reality is composed of structure, hence all structure is in itself real under the premise it is an extension of reality.

Yes, I agree.

Although not essentially necessary except on a human level, from the mind's perspective.

.

''There is a voice that doesn't use words. Listen. '' ~ Rumi

Considering the "human level" exists could not the point be rotated to observe that "humanity" is a necessary extension of "being" considering it is a pivotal point of synthesis between "form" and "no-form" (the height of the human paradox?)