bahman wrote:So what is the western concept of God? Does your God has form?
In the Western view (see Judaism, Christianity, Islam and various others) "God" refers to the Supreme Being. But He has identity, will, specific characteristics and a definite nature. He is never thought to be "all things in one," and especially not to include evil or corruption in His nature.
As such, He can be known if He wishes to make Himself known. He can involve Himself in his Creation if He wishes as well. But not being coextensive with Creation (and Creation itself not being intrinsically "part of" Him, as in much Eastern thought), His interaction with Creation is optional: He can also allow the natural world to proceed naturally, according to laws He has set in place for it. Being a Law-like God, in that His character possesses definite particular traits with which He is utterly consistent, He can self-reveal, and can ground enterprises like science (which presupposes stable natural laws), and can make possible human freedom.
The "form" of God in Christianity is Trinitarian: God is one Entity, but composed of three "aspects" or distinct kinds of agency...Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. While the three partake of exactly the same nature, each occupies a distinct role relative to the Creation and to human beings. "The Father" describes God in His aspect of sovereignty; the Son, in His aspect as "Word" and revelation; "the Spirit" describes God in His relational interactions, among other things.
Good and evil are said to be distinct and mutually exclusive. The Christian God is not, for example, associated in any way with that which is
not good; and thus, evil is not a
counterpart to good, but rather a sort of
corruption or negation of what was originally
intended to be good, that which is corrupted by dint of separation from God. So evil is fully regrettable, detestable and temporary, being a byproduct of human will, not an intrinsic feature of the Divine.
In contrast, in the Eastern way of thinking, broadly speaking, "all is God." "The God" is Unitarian, on the one hand, and yet (in things like Hinduism) may have a million avatars. "The gods" are particular aspects, but all of the Great Unity...as indeed is Creation. As in Gnosticism, "the God" has no particular character and nature, and what in the West is called "good" or "evil" are actually just different aspects of the Eternal Divine Principle, whatever it is. What we call "dark," "destructive" or "evil" in the West is just as much a part of the Eternal Divine Principle as "light," "creation" and "goodness." It's generally unknowable, largely impersonal; and in Buddhism, actually amounts to a sort of great Nothingness into which the human soul disappears with enlightenment.
Now, I have to say that here I'm painting with a broad brush, blending traditions for convenience at the moment; but I'm merely trying to show that there are very, very profound differences between the Eastern and Western ways of thinking about God. If we get that much, then it's enough, I hope, to amount to a reasonably fair response to your question.