Harbal wrote:Dontaskme wrote:
Harbal wrote:and I can't understand your preference for rejecting it in favour of the unknowable.
But I don't understand what you mean by this statement..would you like to elaborate?
If I am misinterpreting you I apologise but you seem to be advocating that we see our existence as a system of mysterious energy waves and intangible concepts. While existence/creation/the Universe is much more than our powers of perception enable us to experience, I think we would be better to confine ourselves to making the most of the part of it that is accessible to our senses. Just as we would expect to be able to communicate more effectively in our own native language, rather than a foreign one, surely we would expect to experience our own existence most satisfactorily if we experience it in accordance with the way our cognitive apparatus is already configured.
I'm saying that everything is known , else it wouldn't be. This doesn't know how or why it is, only that it is. It's a mystery even to itself is all I'm saying. And you are right in that it can only know what is accessible, what it has been experiential to it.
The ABSOLUTE ALL cannot be known as a whole thing not even to itself, how can one thing exist?
How does one thing know or see itself? the all seeing awareness cannot see itself, it can only see parts of itself at reflected fragmented images. Bentinho explains this beautifully if you are interested. I cannot put this into words as precisely as he does.
We as part of that known cannot know how or why everything is the way it is because we are already the known that exists. There is not two here, there is no knower of the known, there is only knowing. There is only the known, reality being a verb.
There is nothing existing outside the everything that already exists ....who knows it exists. It's ever one with the knowing. The known.
The one growing the grass is the same one growing the human. Grass and human are concepts known. That which is already known cannot know anything since it is inclusive of everything known.
I invite you to watch that video by Bentinho Massaro to get a clear and concise picture of how everything is known, but not by 'I' the assumed separate entity.
If this is not for you then I respect that, but please give it some consideration. I would gladly pay you a million pounds to watch it if money was not a problem for me. That's how much I want you to watch it.
if you do decide to watch it, please I would love to hear your feedback comments.
You might even say well yeah, that's just about how it is, and that will be great.
