Did you just say that YouTube is better than nothing?Philosophy Explorer wrote:Which is better than what's backing you upbobevenson wrote:I didn't realize you had YouTube to back you up.
PhilX
Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
At times, yes.thedoc wrote:Did you just say that YouTube is better than nothing?Philosophy Explorer wrote:Which is better than what's backing you upbobevenson wrote:I didn't realize you had YouTube to back you up.
PhilX
PhilX
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
You forgot your multiple smilies.thedoc wrote:Did you just say that YouTube is better than nothing?Philosophy Explorer wrote:Which is better than what's backing you upbobevenson wrote:I didn't realize you had YouTube to back you up.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Doc, he has a hard-on for smiliesbobevenson wrote:You forgot your multiple smilies.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
No, not at all, it just helps to immediately identify the poster as profoundly stupid.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Doc, he has a hard-on for smiliesbobevenson wrote:You forgot your multiple smilies.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
So you're saying this is a stupid website since they're the ones providing the smilies.bobevenson wrote:No, not at all, it just helps to immediately identify the poster as profoundly stupid.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Doc, he has a hard-on for smiliesbobevenson wrote:You forgot your multiple smilies.
PhilX
PhilX
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
That's like saying a gun dealer is the murderer for selling a gun to somebody who commits murder. Of course, people as profoundly stupid as you would probably say, "Right, it's the same thing!"
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Guess again as to who's stupid?bobevenson wrote:That's like saying a gun dealer is the murderer for selling a gun to somebody who commits murder. Of course, people as profoundly stupid as you would probably say, "Right, it's the same thing!"
PhilX
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
I don't believe there's any guessing involved here.
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Guess again as to who's stupid?bobevenson wrote:I don't believe there's any guessing involved here.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Yup, repeating a response word-for-word is a sure sign of profound stupidity.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Guess again as to who's stupid?bobevenson wrote:I don't believe there's any guessing involved here.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Yup, you're looking at that mirror againbobevenson wrote:Yup, repeating a response word-for-word is a sure sign of profound stupidity.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Guess again as to who's stupid?bobevenson wrote:I don't believe there's any guessing involved here.
PhilX
PhilX
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
Bob, would you say it's the same level of profound stupidity as when you repeat yourself, often word-for-word, over and over throughout hundreds of threads and posts -- or is your behavior a sign of an even greater profound stupidity that's off the charts?bobevenson wrote:repeating a response word-for-word is a sure sign of profound stupidity.
And why is your repetition necessary, Bob? Is it not meaningful enough to be valid or valuable the first hundred times you say it? Or are you stuck in a loop... like a broken cuckoo clock... with only a limited set of things to continually repeat?
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
I understand that some consider it insanity, to do the same thing over and over again, and expect different results. So you are saying that Bob has made the same post over and over again, expecting different results?Lacewing wrote:Bob, would you say it's the same level of profound stupidity as when you repeat yourself, often word-for-word, over and over throughout hundreds of threads and posts -- or is your behavior a sign of an even greater profound stupidity that's off the charts?bobevenson wrote:repeating a response word-for-word is a sure sign of profound stupidity.
And why is your repetition necessary, Bob? Is it not meaningful enough to be valid or valuable the first hundred times you say it? Or are you stuck in a loop... like a broken cuckoo clock... with only a limited set of things to continually repeat?
Re: Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?
He repeats the same paragraphs and blurbs, often word-for-word, and often starting new threads to say something he has already said many times.thedoc wrote:I understand that some consider it insanity, to do the same thing over and over again, and expect different results. So you are saying that Bob has made the same post over and over again, expecting different results?
My guess is that he doesn't really expect any results from it -- nor that he does it for that reason. I think he's used to being ignored, and being in his own world. Rather, it's simply about stroking himself in front of people. And if he can stir up some angry interaction, his own anger feeds off of that.
I say this because anytime someone has responded to him respectfully and asked reasonable questions of interest, he ignores them or lashes out. So it seems clear that he's not trying to accomplish anything other than his own self-pleasuring.