What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Gary, please remember that most of the people in this forum are like the detractors of the prophet John on the isle of Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation. By the way, if you add the year Revelation was written (96 AD) plus Iesous in classical Greek gematria (888) plus the time that Christ reigns after Armageddon (1000 years), the total adds up to 1984, the year "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written.
-
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Or they could be right and that you are not a prophet. Who should I believe? You or your detractors? Can you prove to me that you are a prophet?bobevenson wrote:Gary, please remember that most of the people in this forum are like the detractors of the prophet John on the isle of Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation. By the way, if you add the year Revelation was written (96 AD) plus Iesous in classical Greek gematria (888) plus the time that Christ reigns after Armageddon (1000 years), the total adds up to 1984, the year "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Nope, just make a prophecy that we can test is true.bobevenson wrote:Does he have to turn water into wine, or what, exactly?
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
How do you test a divinely inspired utterance? How do you test existentialism?Arising_uk wrote:Nope, just make a prophecy that we can test is true.bobevenson wrote:Does he have to turn water into wine, or what, exactly?
-
- Posts: 7349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
This is not something that can be directly "proved." Like I said earlier, I think it has to be something more indirect, like mystical coincidences that seem to come out of nowhere and beyond anybody's control.Gary Childress wrote:Or they could be right and that you are not a prophet. Who should I believe? You or your detractors? Can you prove to me that you are a prophet?bobevenson wrote:Gary, please remember that most of the people in this forum are like the detractors of the prophet John on the isle of Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation. By the way, if you add the year Revelation was written (96 AD) plus Iesous in classical Greek gematria (888) plus the time that Christ reigns after Armageddon (1000 years), the total adds up to 1984, the year "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written.
-
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Well, a little more than that even, maybe. For obvious example, someone could "prophesize" that the sun will rise tomorrow. I wouldn't call that the work of a "prophet" either. It would have to be something more astounding than that.Arising_uk wrote:Nope, just make a prophecy that we can test is true.bobevenson wrote:Does he have to turn water into wine, or what, exactly?
-
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
So in other words you are not sure you are a prophet either?bobevenson wrote:This is not something that can be directly "proved." Like I said earlier, I think it has to be something more indirect, like mystical coincidences that seem to come out of nowhere and beyond anybody's control.[/size][/b]Gary Childress wrote:Or they could be right and that you are not a prophet. Who should I believe? You or your detractors? Can you prove to me that you are a prophet?bobevenson wrote:Gary, please remember that most of the people in this forum are like the detractors of the prophet John on the isle of Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation. By the way, if you add the year Revelation was written (96 AD) plus Iesous in classical Greek gematria (888) plus the time that Christ reigns after Armageddon (1000 years), the total adds up to 1984, the year "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written.
What do "mystical coincidences" tell us, though? Numerology is the equivalent of something like this:
2 + 2 = 4 and there are 4 legs on a giraffe and 4 quarters in a whole, and my first name is 4 letters long.
I mean, what can I conclude from that? what does that "mean"? Even assuming it were some sort of "sign" from God, what then is God trying to tell us?
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
bobevenson wrote:How do you test a divinely inspired utterance? How do you test existentialism?Arising_uk wrote:Nope, just make a prophecy that we can test is true.bobevenson wrote:Does he have to turn water into wine, or what, exactly?
What type of existentialism did you have in mind Bob?
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Lacewing to Bobevenson wrote:Are you completely dense?
A bit. I actually would like to hear what people will answer honestly to any question I pose. But I'm not surprised that anyone whom I would ask such a question as this, is not likely to be someone who can or will answer what I typically ask. Self-reflection threatens their game plan.Obvious Leo wrote: This is a rhetorical question, right?
I experience this a LOT. Many people experience this. Anyone CAN experience this. It's natural. My guess is that we don't need prophets telling us that we need them; they are an extra layer that obscures and manipulates. Humans don't need intermediaries between themselves and their source (whatever it may be). There are limitless insights we can have. None of them should be put on a pedestal or turned into an idol....it has to be something more indirect, like mystical coincidences that seem to come out of nowhere and beyond anybody's control.
Whatever we make it up to be.Gary Childress wrote:Even assuming it were some sort of "sign" from God, what then is God trying to tell us?
-
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
What sorts of "mystical coincidences" have you experienced?Lacewing wrote:I experience this a LOT. Many people experience this. Anyone CAN experience this. It's natural. My guess is that we don't need prophets telling us that we need them; they are an extra layer that obscures and manipulates. Humans don't need intermediaries between themselves and their source (whatever it may be). There are limitless insights we can have. None of them should be put on a pedestal or turned into an idol.
-
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
You take considerable liberties with our language if you suppose that a term such as "self-reflection" can be sensibly applied to an utterance emanating from the polluted mind of Bob Evenson.Lacewing wrote:Self-reflection threatens their game plan.
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Hi Gary. This is normally the kind of topic I LOVE discussing... as I think it is so interesting to realize what is possible beyond the confines of what we consider "real/normal". I've had experiences that truly transcend myself and the physical/material reality we are used to. (No drugs of any kind. And I don't think of it as any kind of meditation.) It's like naturally merging with a mainframe for a few moments, and being aware of how everything is connected and flowing, and knowing what to do to align in a certain way. It's not about "thinking" or manipulating -- it's just open awareness. The "me" disappears. The world's drama and stories disappear. I've been left with the impression that everything is sacred and connected... but none of it means anything in the way we think it does. Being here is a temporary dance we can do with joy or horror or anywhere in-between. Beyond "this", is beyond our comprehension right now. There have been times I've described these experiences as being like "drinking from a fire hose"... because just a few moments are enough. Such an experience really blows the doors off of this world (for me) as we think we know it. It's like seeing behind a curtain... and it's really a beautiful and perfect and peaceful realm. I can only guess that we creatively torment ourselves for entertainment. (That's my best attempt to describe something that's really beyond human concepts/words.)Gary Childress wrote: What sorts of "mystical coincidences" have you experienced?
This forum does not appear to be a place that would appreciate and support the sharing of such experiences, so I probably won't with any detail. I've gotten the impression that there are people here who just want to snatch up what they can to use against others... to tear others down... and it's really kind of a pathetic display of wasted potential... but it has it's entertainment value for a little while. I think that everything we do either digs us in deeper, or propels us on to more expanded spaces. The more we understand... the more dances we can interact with... the more flexible we are on all levels. Any time we think we've got it all figured out... we are buried so much deeper than if we understood we didn't know much of anything.
-
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
That's very poetic Lacewing. Sounds like you have had some very spiritually moving experiences.Lacewing wrote:Hi Gary. This is normally the kind of topic I LOVE discussing... as I think it is so interesting to realize what is possible beyond the confines of what we consider "real/normal". I've had experiences that truly transcend myself and the physical/material reality we are used to. (No drugs of any kind. And I don't think of it as any kind of meditation.) It's like naturally merging with a mainframe for a few moments, and being aware of how everything is connected and flowing, and knowing what to do to align in a certain way. It's not about "thinking" or manipulating -- it's just open awareness. The "me" disappears. The world's drama and stories disappear. I've been left with the impression that everything is sacred and connected... but none of it means anything in the way we think it does. Being here is a temporary dance we can do with joy or horror or anywhere in-between. Beyond "this", is beyond our comprehension right now. There have been times I've described these experiences as being like "drinking from a fire hose"... because just a few moments are enough. Such an experience really blows the doors off of this world (for me) as we think we know it. It's like seeing behind a curtain... and it's really a beautiful and perfect and peaceful realm. I can only guess that we creatively torment ourselves for entertainment. (That's my best attempt to describe something that's really beyond human concepts/words.)Gary Childress wrote: What sorts of "mystical coincidences" have you experienced?
This forum does not appear to be a place that would appreciate and support the sharing of such experiences, so I probably won't with any detail. I've gotten the impression that there are people here who just want to snatch up what they can to use against others... to tear others down... and it's really kind of a pathetic display of wasted potential... but it has it's entertainment value for a little while. I think that everything we do either digs us in deeper, or propels us on to more expanded spaces. The more we understand... the more dances we can interact with... the more flexible we are on all levels. Any time we think we've got it all figured out... we are buried so much deeper than if we understood we didn't know much of anything.
There are times when I wonder to myself if we are not our own biggest barriers to spirituality because we are too skeptical. On the other hand I think there is a sense in which skepticism can also be healthy to an extent. For example if I suddenly started hearing voices that told me to jump off a cliff skepticism might be a good thing.
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Thank you Gary.Gary Childress wrote: That's very poetic Lacewing.
I agree with you -- skepticism can be a very good thing! We don't all want to be flailing around and chasing after things willy nilly.Gary Childress wrote: There are times when I wonder to myself if we are not our own biggest barriers to spirituality because we are too skeptical. On the other hand I think there is a sense in which skepticism can also be healthy to an extent. For example if I suddenly started hearing voices that told me to jump off a cliff skepticism might be a good thing.
Hmm... I'm thinking about this in relation to spirituality. I think skepticism is good for analyzing and making decisions on one channel... and the depths of spirituality are on another channel. And it's helpful to consider the information on both channels, but not let the broadcasts cross-over in a way that confuses both messages? Hopefully we aren't too hard on ourselves or others for having "noisy reception"... we compassionately understand that we're noisy humans, doing the best we can in this challenging life experience... and we bravely keep striving to adjust our antenna for clearer reception! And then, perhaps: Clarity becomes more important than ego.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: What would it take to convince you that somebody is a prophet?
Well, you either show me this 'God' or you make a prophecy with a time constraint.bobevenson wrote:How do you test a divinely inspired utterance? ...
You philosophise about it, something you appear loathe to do with your 'prophesying'.How do you test existentialism?