No true Scotsman. It's a fallacy, dontcha know?Immanuel Can wrote:If a real Christian ever "makes a noise" it will only ever be in aid of something important for other people --
How about an internet forum?Immanuel Can wrote:It will never be to preen in front of a camera.
It's only a fallacy when the "true" nature of Scottishness simply cannot be specified by any rational means. If it can, then we can indeed have a "true" or "false" Scotsman, and it's no fallacy.No true Scotsman. It's a fallacy, dontcha know?
Ha. To preen on an open, unmoderated internet forum is surely one of the lowest achievements a person can have. It's pretty much just one step ahead of winning a video game.How about an internet forum?
Good. Any man today who does not side with feminists is not much of a man.thedoc wrote:I have 2 daughters and I have fought for them to be equal and free in society. I'll take my lumps to that end, and I rail at any scripture that tries to put women into a lesser position to men.Greatest I am wrote: Should secular governments pick up the pace and shed ourselves of the misogynous Qur’an and Bible. Have those cursed books created enough grief for women and gays? Have we allowed the downgrading of women long enough?
Man is God. God needs and wants a Goddess. Secular men are free and equal. Should our women not also be free and equal?
Regards
DL
Don't be silly.Immanuel Can wrote:It's only a fallacy when the "true" nature of Scottishness simply cannot be specified by any rational means. If it can, then we can indeed have a "true" or "false" Scotsman, and it's no fallacy.No true Scotsman. It's a fallacy, dontcha know?
"Christian" is very specifiable, in a way that son-of-Scotland is not.
Then don't you think you should aim higher?Immanuel Can wrote:Ha. To preen on an open, unmoderated internet forum is surely one of the lowest achievements a person can have. It's pretty much just one step ahead of winning a video game.How about an internet forum?
You mean, don't you think anyone should aim higher than the gratuitously ad hominem?Then don't you think you should aim higher?
