Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 7:21 am
The Bible teaches that God is all-knowing or omniscient. When we say that God is omniscient it means that He has perfect knowledge of all things.
I guess that means your “free will” was another LIE
Apparently you have not even studied the Bible, like most who have a lot to say about something they have not bothered to study.
The Bible, repeatedly tells the reader that it is sealed to man's understanding until after a certain point in human history, and even plainly states that mankind will not even be able to read it.
So, show me that you even know what literacy is and its relationship to judgment? The Bible hides nothing, it does, however, take full advantage of language processing via common grammar. Can you even explain the difference between literal and metaphorical, say, in mathematical terms? Can you name a number of word pairs which denote the same concept?
And, if you are so arrogant as to believe you are literate, the Bible does put into the metaphor the biologically defined job of a mind, so that if you could read it, you can solve and show the solution to the Name of the Beast 666, which works out to be: To regulate behavior so as to turn the past into a future and to bring that future to pass. The Book shows you, at least four times, how to solve the metaphor. The exact purpose of grammar and how it is used for survival. You can call it judgment, predictive behavior, or prophecy, or even in another metaphor, The Testimony of Jesus is the Spirit of Prophecy. Now, it has nothing to do with rolling on the floor and spouting gibberish about being a prophet sent by gowd to make money preaching the word.
Now, I do not claim to be a computer expert, but I was trained by the military to work on classified electronics and have been a state certified electronics technician, not to mention worked as a beta tester for Microsoft because they asked me to. So, you would have a very hard time convincing me that binary recursion is different from the ability to turn a light bulb on and off. See if you can light up a bit.
All of the metaphors of the Bible resolve to simple biological fact, so, it proves you do not even know yourself.
And, if you are literate and could read: Adam and Eve are a Conjugate Binary Pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produce the human race.
Transform that using the definition of a thing as a relative and correlative.
A relative and correlative are a Conjugate Binary Pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces the entire Universe.
Transform it again for grammar systems.
A relative and correlative are a Conjugate Binary pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces every possible system of Grammar, even that of Common Grammar, Arithmetic Algebra and Geometry affording mankind the possibility of judgment.
Now, Transform it again, relative to your own computer
A relative and correlative are a Conjugate Binary pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces every form of information processing, every output and behavior of a computer.
Plato called it dialectic, and you did not even understand him, what makes you believe you can understand the Bible, when it is clear you never even understood the definition of a thing itself?
You are not even bright enough to know you are wholly illiterate.
So, when the Bible informs you, that you cannot even read, do not even know the principles reading is based on, argue not with the Book, but with your own computer. Maybe you can claim you are its prophet?
Secondly, do you even know the difference between will and doing what pleases one? A dog and cat or other animals do what they please, but what is will? and how is it that people are so illiterate as to imagine that it means doing what one pleases?
Have you even studied the distinction, Plato show you the logical distinction? can you recall any of that argument?
Or, have you even studied Plato?
One can put it another way, is there any life support system of a living organism which does as it pleases, or is its behavior biologically and physically defined?