I can't think of any particular 'sources'. For some reason I thought Isaac Newton was Jewish. Then again, you haven't cited any great Chinese, Indian, or African scientists either, so perhaps your 'ethnic prejudice' is showing...RCSaunders wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 6:02 pmNicolaus Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, William Harvey, Robert Boyle, Robert Hooke, Francesco Redi, Sir Isaac Newton, Christiaan Huygens, Leibniz, Antoine Lavoisier, Edward Jenner, Alessandro Volta, John Dalton, Georg Ohm, Amedeo Avogadro, Michael Faraday, Lord Kelvin, Louis Pasteur, James Clerk Maxwell, Gregor Mendel, Dmitri Mendeleev, William Crookes, J.J. Thomson, Marie Curie, Antoine Henri Becquerel, Max Planck, Ernest Rutherford, Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg, Paul Dirac, Alexander Fleming, James Chadwick were Jewish? [None of them were of any Jewish ancestry.] The only big names in the history of science that were Jewish were Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, and Wolfgang Pauli.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 3:01 am And why do most of the greatest scientific minds seem to belong to people of Jewish ancestry? You don't need any IQ test to see that obvious fact.
I suspect your sources are probably published by those of Jewish ancestry. In the history of science there is no ethnic dominance. I'm surprised you've fallen for that particular variety of ethnic prejudice.
more IQ shit
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: more IQ shit
Re: more IQ shit
Bias implies no intent.Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 5:46 am IQ questions of the past that are called culturally biased, never were. Bias requires intent. Those were simply bad questions because some people would not be able to understand them regardless of IQ, thereby reducing the effective correlation of tests in which they were included with other relevant measures. That was simple, early growing pains, not an indictment of the process or the results, and more recent tests have removed all questions that have any such unintentional confusions.
Questions set by white, American, mostly jewish, middle class men, and Ivy League educated tended to employ words that were in their everyday vocabulary, and not in the every day vocabulary of little black girls living in NY or teenage Mexicans living in East LA, nor housewives living in Spokane
Whether the educated white boys meant to favour themselves intentionally or other wise does not change the fact that the tests were biased, and tended to find that people who were not white educated boys had lower intelligence than them.
Surprise surprise.
Yes, those questions were bad, they were bad as they were biased.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: more IQ shit
Talk about condescending and racist The woke are so clueless and lacking in self awareness. Of course they are beyond reproach, since they are the moral standard-bearers for humankind.Bias implies no intent.Advocate wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 5:46 am IQ questions of the past that are called culturally biased, never were. Bias requires intent. Those were simply bad questions because some people would not be able to understand them regardless of IQ, thereby reducing the effective correlation of tests in which they were included with other relevant measures. That was simple, early growing pains, not an indictment of the process or the results, and more recent tests have removed all questions that have any such unintentional confusions.
Questions set by white, American, mostly jewish, middle class men, and Ivy League educated tended to employ words that were in their everyday vocabulary, and not in the every day vocabulary of little black girls living in NY or teenage Mexicans living in East LA, nor housewives living in Spokane
Whether the educated white boys meant to favour themselves intentionally or other wise does not change the fact that the tests were biased, and tended to find that people who were not white educated boys had lower intelligence than them.
Surprise surprise.
Yes, those questions were bad, they were bad as they were biased.