Consciousness

Is the mind the same as the body? What is consciousness? Can machines have it?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

Consciousness is reaction to stimuls, the real puzzle is the hardware that processes the reaction, for like subject and object, they cannot be separated.
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

Jori wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:12 am Is consciousness just a function of the brain, like digestion is a function of the digestive organs. When the digestive organs die, then there will be no more digestion. Similarly, when the brain dies, there will be no more consciousness. Therefore, there is no afterlife. What do you think?
Jori,
while I think it true that the brain is the central processing organ it relies however on full-body consciousness in order to process the world as changes in the state of the body [ a little Spinoza there]. It is my personal belief that consciousness is reaction and that all organisms are reactionary creatures. We know perception is a reaction but I think the whole process of acquiring meaning is reaction though undoubtedly highly complex. No there is no afterlife of an individual but consciousness and the essence of that which is life is a spark passed down through the generations losing apparently nothing in the transition. So, if you identify with the body that has a determined life span, consciousness is relatively immortal and it's all around us everywhere one could look. Reaction as consciousness is even how life adapts to the changing environment without which life would cease to be. Even illness when one thinks about it, if not due to old age or physical injury, is the reaction to something invasive chemical or biological, illness is a reaction and when the reaction/as in the immune system is inadequate one gets more ill until one dies.
Last edited by popeye1945 on Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
trokanmariel
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by trokanmariel »

Prior to existence, there was the art meta (art meta meaning the hierarchy between arts as a physics reliability), governing the prelude to body glamour's gravitation to body glamour, in the form of Kelly Brook's BOSS (BOSS being the look of Brook's face) using the real pull to writing philosophy.

The real pull, to writing; it is about the audacity, of the physics apparatus being a real physics machine, which has caused the analysis aristocracy of demonic follow-up to acceptance of defeat by the weakness apparatus reality.

To be specific:
all of existence is made up of sequence to block demonics, in which the theology/non-theology framework of why the betrayal through symmetry (curiously, the present publication didn't hear the aristocracy's science) is able to sustain the duplication of the Kelly Brook-BOSS logic as God intelligence (Kelly Brook referring to the British model)'s physics as physics machine, due to the then non-political issue of bridges of idea vindications (Paul Walker's Theme Correlation);

So, what gives?

I just got back from Sainsbury's, and thought about the Bernard Matthews/Bounty chocolate packages both being a Heaven red-white co-ordination; the reason, for the reference, is that prior to heading out to the supermarket, my previous post on this site consisted of a usual application - as supernatural reception by reality's weakness apparatus - of magic's political authority, over the principle that writing being technology, means that Peek-A-Boo is able to exert the demonic exhibition/demonic socialism to the user of technology.
Why did the Bernard Matthews/Bounty bags present themselves to me, as a symbolism recognition of the demonic story by Christian Camargo's Dracula's H, presented as red and white?
Ostensibly, it's because the system involved isn't able to know that the demonic socialism presentation wasn't a physics machine.

In return, for the discrepancy, what I'll give to the system responsible for the symmetry ambition is this;
the non-possession, of arrangement of algebra physics is a universal anchor system, for the magic/Heaven mission to stabilize identity matter from the problem of data chaos, the specific context being the TV advert syndrome, in which identity matter's logistics aren't able to cope with the confusion of politics (politics here referring to geopolitics, internationalism, adultery, business competition, the jobs market, as well as meta versions, including left-wing transcendence from marriage society (Samantha Worzeil gave me that edit), physics keeping up with the metaphor, while the demon story of sex aristocracy stabilizes itself from the balance of physics - finally, a Mason Dertry sorrow) using the weakness apparatus of reality.



the non-possession, of arrangement of algebra physics as a universal anchor system:
It must be a daylight context of anchor as relay. Relay, of course, just referring to repeat. Anchor, however, referring to a matter as physics as not physics disparity of definition to observer.

In any case, the overall identity is a cluster of mission, to not only restore the Kelly Brook-Thomas Heath no need for rushing to the origin real sex aristocracy, but, to be able to freely investigate the self-containment of arrangement of algebra terminology.


Algebra's real meaning; a selection by consumer apparatus, which may have been the Thomas Heath achilles heel, before the gravitation to body glamour dimension.
Physics grabs, of daylight being a rebooter of morality - is this a rival to the algebra identity?

What is the artistic difference, between physics grabs, and selection by consumer: the selection by consumer reality, based perhaps on the absence of colours being the user, doesn't invite the emotional socialism, of physics replicating its imagination potential onto the reality meanings/machines of technology devices, such as books, images, posters, scientific method realities, like quantum mechanics, to do with the original mystery of the dismantlement of the Kelly Brook-Thomas Heath real pull to writing from physics machine, because slots (of the same matter consciousness of the Peek-A-Boo sex aristocracy slots) can have the right to use text as story.

The right to use text, as story:
in the everyday world, people can't use text. They can't interact with it, just as they can't interact with movies, however -

there is the absence to absence world, of the same identity matter problem, to do with TV adverts (the exact problem being the confusion of which self-awareness to follow), in which the matter consciousness of the identity matter is fine. It is functional, meaning that the chaos is its logic.


Can this analysis be a means to turn text into a living entity, which can find as a directionless mode the universe's socialism to sex-sex to socialism pendulum.
trokanmariel
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by trokanmariel »

The Consciousness:

The physics grab, of metaphors by computation never letting go of hero never lets go of death morality, during the staircase death physics mythology of 21st century society paradigm, is able to oversee (as in beat), the political governance by theology's name-calling science (specifically, the outer space as physics encapsulation within mind despite the outer space is able to justify itself against the mind's gravitation) over Thomas Heath's self-defeatism irony being a weapon against the singularity detachment:

body glamour, is a refusal syndrome to unfairly compete against the daylight internal conflict: Characters of Days v Days being Socialists
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

Jori wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 8:12 am Is consciousness just a function of the brain, like digestion is a function of the digestive organs. When the digestive organs die, then there will be no more digestion. Similarly, when the brain dies, there will be no more consciousness. Therefore, there is no afterlife. What do you think?
Jori,
Consciousness is passed on through the generations, but consciousness itself is the state of biology that can experience and thus react to the stimulus which is the world. The world being cause to all reactive organisms, cause and effect is the driving force of nature. We gain identity through the experiences of our environmental context, as in how we think and feel about being in the world. This is the identity that we died to, the cause and effect of our identity, but is it really our essence or is it a lot of meaningless physics and chemistry? Is it a hungry molecule with an urge to reproduce? There can be little doubt about one thing, consciousness is the organism's main survival tool as it processes the world to give us an apparent reality.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: Consciousness

Post by Agent Smith »

Nobody has actually seen God! Isn't that just amazing!
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9939
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Consciousness

Post by attofishpi »

Agent Smith wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:30 pm Nobody has actually seen God! Isn't that just amazing!
Nope. All reality IS God, thus even when you close your eyes you are looking at IT.
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

attofishpi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:26 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:30 pm Nobody has actually seen God! Isn't that just amazing!
Nope. All reality IS God, thus even when you close your eyes you are looking at IT.
That is Spinoza's god, welcome to pantheism.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9939
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Consciousness

Post by attofishpi »

popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:51 am
attofishpi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:26 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:30 pm Nobody has actually seen God! Isn't that just amazing!
Nope. All reality IS God, thus even when you close your eyes you are looking at IT.
That is Spinoza's god, welcome to pantheism.
Holy crap Poppy I had no idea, thanks for pointing that out!
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

attofishpi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:01 am
popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:51 am
attofishpi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:26 am

Nope. All reality IS God, thus even when you close your eyes you are looking at IT.
That is Spinoza's god, welcome to pantheism.
Holy crap Poppy I had no idea, thanks for pointing that out!
You're quite welcome!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9939
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Consciousness

Post by attofishpi »

:roll:
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: Consciousness

Post by Agent Smith »

popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:51 am
attofishpi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:26 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:30 pm Nobody has actually seen God! Isn't that just amazing!
Nope. All reality IS God, thus even when you close your eyes you are looking at IT.
That is Spinoza's god, welcome to pantheism.
Si, that's one way to look at it, but some are clearly unhappy with pantheism, oui?
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

Agent Smith wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:45 am
popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:51 am
attofishpi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:26 am

Nope. All reality IS God, thus even when you close your eyes you are looking at IT.
That is Spinoza's god, welcome to pantheism.
Si, that's one way to look at it, but some are clearly unhappy with pantheism, oui?
Of course, many people would not be happy except with an anthropomorphic god
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: Consciousness

Post by Agent Smith »

popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 6:49 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:45 am
popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:51 am

That is Spinoza's god, welcome to pantheism.
Si, that's one way to look at it, but some are clearly unhappy with pantheism, oui?
Of course, many people would not be happy except with an anthropomorphic god
How true! What's so anthropomorphic about the Abrahamic god?
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: Consciousness

Post by popeye1945 »

Agent Smith wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 6:56 am
popeye1945 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 6:49 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:45 am

Si, that's one way to look at it, but some are clearly unhappy with pantheism, oui?
Of course, many people would not be happy except with an anthropomorphic god
How true! What's so anthropomorphic about the Abrahamic god?
All the desert religions are anthropomorphic, meaning made in the image of man, like a god with a human temperament who gets pissed off with his believers----lol!!
Post Reply