bahman wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:10 pmWhat are the codes of cynicism? What are the differences between the two sorts of codes? Are you saying that what is going to happen on May 28 is related to the horror that is due to you?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:35 pm
In general, I was happy with the quantity from absence system that I created, from your May 28th comment.
Quantity from absence: the natural dichotomy, of skill.
I used a skill, and am happy with it. However, the link between the outcome of happiness and the double tap system that was referenced means that I feel a new bequeathment, to the double tap system.
The double tap system:
to me personally, it is the undoing of the forces that govern me, as it is anti-climactic.
I use the term this way:
Anti = opposes
Climactic = a reference to the editions of climax, thus, the logical means of fallout from the editions themselves.
The forces, that govern me, granted some of them, can either just be a strand of code of cynicism, or can be a macro reality which possesses all of the codes of cynicism.
Now, the following step, from this acknowledgement, is does the either or question pertain to the dynamic of needless work?
Another question:
One of the people, who I've become privy to, over the past two years, is the magic version of Jane Levy's character from 2013 Evil Dead.
Specifically, the scene where Levy's Mia is in the car, smiling at her brother.
In ensuing time, from the recent history, the magic person - who I call "I Di" - has become developed to embodying the theme of materialism from gothic. You see, i have a co-ordination process, in my mind, run by the people of my mind, and it tells a story.
What piques my interest, is the idea that I Di's attachment to the materialism angle is an edition of the angle.
I suspect, that underlying my picqued interest, is the symmetry to the deconstruction of horror horror.
The haunted house generic, of wherein all units of the house can be exposed, (an Alex Cross attribute - from the same mental operation process).
By exposed, I just mean that anything within and part of the haunted house experience can be turned into reality.
What are your thoughts?
First, thank you for your queries. I welcome them earnestly.
For the first query:
There is the sort, of using identical evils (Jesse Reeves is listening to me) on the condition of reality. There are disparities in use, at least when the act of data publication isn't taking place.
For the next query, there is the real person, possessing the codes, versus the act itself.
Peek-A-Boo, who is God of the universe and everything, sometimes tries to tell me that her different images in my mind are not associated with each other. The supernatural force, within me, is that I know which editions of her Will of Sting image to cling onto.
Before I address your last query, I'll try to describe the Will of Sting:
The WOS, is God's scientific and love sequence to humanity, and to all life - that her bimbo persona, becomes a superhero persona, in which the latter is having to fend off a bee force.
The bumblebee invades God's institution, and the WOS image is God struggling to grasp onto a pole of sorts - a bar.
Now, I'll address your last query:
I managed to clarify, the query. Is May 28th related to what happens in my mind?
Originally, I read your question as is there going to be a horror due to me? But, because of the separation between that aspect of the question and first part, I was able to experience the terror of the May 28th hypothesis.
There was no experience, just the act of symbolism supporting the reading.
And that's the bingo element!
People read things, and it's possible that they either forget or fail to register the concept: that symbolism supports their reading of the thing.
And, it's happened again:
in the previous post, there was the EE bookend. Now, there's the supporting bookend.
Would you agree with this?