And what you can NOT do is explain away YOUR OBVIOUS CONTRADICTION here.bahman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:06 pmI do what I can.Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:00 pmLOL Well you are NOT doing a very good job of that.
If you want to make your, so called, "logic" SIMPLE, then EXPLAIN YOUR CONTRADICTION when you state and CLAIM:
"we ARE minds" with "we HAVE minds"?
I have ALREADY EXPLAINED and SHOWN that it is a logical IMPOSSIBILITY to be the 'thing' that you have.
Mind is free therefore it is immortal
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
What is my contradiction?Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:02 amAnd what you can NOT do is explain away YOUR OBVIOUS CONTRADICTION here.bahman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:06 pmI do what I can.Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:00 pm
LOL Well you are NOT doing a very good job of that.
If you want to make your, so called, "logic" SIMPLE, then EXPLAIN YOUR CONTRADICTION when you state and CLAIM:
"we ARE minds" with "we HAVE minds"?
I have ALREADY EXPLAINED and SHOWN that it is a logical IMPOSSIBILITY to be the 'thing' that you have.
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
Saying and stating;
"we ARE minds" while also saying and stating; "we HAVE minds" is a PURE and ABSOLUTE 'contradiction', OBVIOUSLY.
"we ARE minds" while also saying and stating; "we HAVE minds" is a PURE and ABSOLUTE 'contradiction', OBVIOUSLY.
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
And I explained several times that there is nothing wrong with what I said. It totally depends on what I mean with "we". Do you remember my explanation?
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
I mean when someone replies to you, here in this forum, do you always read EVERY thing they write?
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
No.
Will you repeat your, so called, "explanation"?
And, how do 'I' KNOW what 'you' mean by 'we' if you mean different things at different times?
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
Sure I read.
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
"We" in "we have minds" refers to human beings. "We" in "we are minds" obviously refers to collection of minds.Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:16 amNo.
Will you repeat your, so called, "explanation"?
And, how do 'I' KNOW what 'you' mean by 'we' if you mean different things at different times?
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
So, just to make this absolutely CLEAR, do you read absolutely EVERY sentence whenever you read a reply, which has been made to you, here in this forum?
A 'yes' or a 'no' response is all that is needed to make this absolutely CLEAR. A response like; "Sure I read" does NOT clarify NOR make ANY thing CLEAR here in regards to the actual clarifying question that I am asking you. Is this understood by you?
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
LOLbahman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:22 am"We" in "we have minds" refers to human beings. "We" in "we are minds" obviously refers to collection of minds.
You STILL have MISSED, MISUNDERSTOOD, and MISINTERPRETED what I have been saying and asking you.
I will try ONCE AGAIN.
Saying, "we ARE minds" means 'we ARE minds'.
Whereas, saying, "we HAVE minds" means 'we ARE NOT minds' because 'we' ARE some 'thing' else that HAS 'minds'.
Do you comprehend and understand this now?
LOOK, I UNDERSTAND PERFECTLY WHY 'you' are SO BLIND, LOST and CONFUSED here. This is because I UNDERSTAND FULLY how the Mind and the brain work. But I do NOT YET KNOW how to EXPLAIN this to 'you', human beings.
I am still just in the process of learning how to communicate better with 'you', human beings.
Last edited by Age on Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
I see. But I think I cleared that a long time ago.Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:28 amLOL
You STILL have MISSED, MISUNDERSTOOD, and MISINTERPRETED what I have been saying and asking you.
I will try ONCE AGAIN.
Saying, "we ARE minds" means 'we ARE minds'.
Whereas, saying, "we HAVE minds" means 'we ARE NOT minds' because 'we' ARE some 'thing' else that HAS 'minds'.
Do you comprehend and understand this now?
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
But I asked you to CLEAR THIS UP. You said you ALREADY HAVE and PROVIDED EXAMPLES. I have now INFORMED you that you are STILL BLIND and CONFUSED. So, 'trying to' say "that you think you cleared this up a long time ago", is just ANOTHER DIVERSIONARY TACTIC of yours.bahman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:30 amI see. But I think I cleared that a long time ago.Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:28 amLOL
You STILL have MISSED, MISUNDERSTOOD, and MISINTERPRETED what I have been saying and asking you.
I will try ONCE AGAIN.
Saying, "we ARE minds" means 'we ARE minds'.
Whereas, saying, "we HAVE minds" means 'we ARE NOT minds' because 'we' ARE some 'thing' else that HAS 'minds'.
Do you comprehend and understand this now?
You OBVIOUSLY have NOT YET CLEARED this up. This is because you still have NOT YET SEEN the CONTRADICTION, ITSELF.
Re: Mind is free therefore it is immortal
What other contradiction you are talking about?Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:53 amBut I asked you to CLEAR THIS UP. You said you ALREADY HAVE and PROVIDED EXAMPLES. I have now INFORMED you that you are STILL BLIND and CONFUSED. So, 'trying to' say "that you think you cleared this up a long time ago", is just ANOTHER DIVERSIONARY TACTIC of yours.bahman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:30 amI see. But I think I cleared that a long time ago.Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:28 am
LOL
You STILL have MISSED, MISUNDERSTOOD, and MISINTERPRETED what I have been saying and asking you.
I will try ONCE AGAIN.
Saying, "we ARE minds" means 'we ARE minds'.
Whereas, saying, "we HAVE minds" means 'we ARE NOT minds' because 'we' ARE some 'thing' else that HAS 'minds'.
Do you comprehend and understand this now?
You OBVIOUSLY have NOT YET CLEARED this up. This is because you still have NOT YET SEEN the CONTRADICTION, ITSELF.