bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:43 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:34 am
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:16 am
Ohh come on. Give it a try and tell me where I am wrong. That should be shorter than what you already wrote in this post if you think it is very evident.
YOUR INABILITY TO DEFINE what a mind IS is WHERE you are WRONG.
I already defined the mind. What is wrong with that? What do you not understand?
You CLAIM "mind is substance". That is NOT saying what 'mind', itself, IS.
LOOK, How else do 'you' define 'mind'?
What can be CLEARLY SEEN is that 'you' can NOT definitely pin down what 'mind' IS. So, that is WHERE 'you' are WRONG.
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:43 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:34 am
WHEN YOU CLAIM that, "we ARE minds", BUT ALSO CLAIM that, "we HAVE minds" is WHERE you are WRONG.
That I already clarified. By we are minds I mean we are the things that I defined as mind. We of course have the body too. By we have minds I mean that we humans have minds, and also bodies.
You are ONLY convoluting AND contradicting "your" OWN 'self' here.
Can you REALLY STILL NOT YET SEE the CONTRADICTION here?
If yes, then this is WHERE you are WRONG.
But if no, then this is WHERE you are WRONG, as well.
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:43 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:34 am
Along with the countless OTHER TIMES that YOU ARE WRONG.
Off-topic.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:34 am
But let us START with those TWO FIRST.
Ok.
Well you have only SHOWN "yourself" to be MORE WRONG.
Once again, HOW can 'you' be 'a mind' as well as 'have a mind'?
You OBVIOUSLY can NOT be both. It this YET understood by 'you'?