No you didn't.
But you are still wrong aren't you.
The point being made though, is that that which is observed cannot observe, therefore any thing observed cannot be the observer....comprende ?
No you didn't.
But you are still wrong aren't you.
The point being made though, is that that which is observed cannot observe, therefore any thing observed cannot be the observer....comprende ?
Yes I did.....when I wrote ...What is ''looked upon'' aka a mirror, is just a reflection of what's looking, aka emptiness appearing full, aka an image of the imageless.
Knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of reality, as no knower has ever been seen, only known by no one.
But you are still wrong aren't you.
What you said was this.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:37 pmYes I did.....when I wrote ...What is ''looked upon'' aka a mirror, is just a reflection of what's looking, aka emptiness appearing full, aka an image of the imageless.
Knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of reality, as no knower has ever been seen, only known by no one.
But you are still wrong aren't you.
That’s right, the observed cannot observe. There’s only Observing ..as the observer and the observed are inseparable one unitary action.Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:58 pmBUT.
THE OBSERVER CANNOT BE THE OBSERVED
It's the bloody thread title.
And you clinically insane?
PLONK!Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:06 pmThat’s right, the observed cannot observe. There’s only Observing ..as the observer and the observed are inseparable one unitary action.
The observer is the observed means the observed is a known concept known only within this immediate knowing non conceptual observing.
A concept known does not know...it’s already being known by that which is unknowable.
All knowns are appearances of the unknowable, aka illusions.
The observed appears to be the knower, but that’s the illusion, there simply is no knower there, only the idea, which is just emptiness appearing full.
Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:32 pmPLONK!Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:06 pmThat’s right, the observed cannot observe. There’s only Observing ..as the observer and the observed are inseparable one unitary action.
The observer is the observed means the observed is a known concept known only within this immediate knowing non conceptual observing.
A concept known does not know...it’s already being known by that which is unknowable.
All knowns are appearances of the unknowable, aka illusions.
The observed appears to be the knower, but that’s the illusion, there simply is no knower there, only the idea, which is just emptiness appearing full.
No not okay at all.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:24 amSculptor wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:32 pmPLONK!Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:06 pm
That’s right, the observed cannot observe. There’s only Observing ..as the observer and the observed are inseparable one unitary action.
The observer is the observed means the observed is a known concept known only within this immediate knowing non conceptual observing.
A concept known does not know...it’s already being known by that which is unknowable.
All knowns are appearances of the unknowable, aka illusions.
The observed appears to be the knower, but that’s the illusion, there simply is no knower there, only the idea, which is just emptiness appearing full.
In saying The “observer is the observed” does not imply the “observer” can be observed. It just means there’s only OBSERVING and that this “observing” cannot then observe this observing....OK?
I identify as a homo sapiens. I regard all subcategories of this as divisive and potentially dangerous the health of humanity, and suspect all who promote other forms of group identity, which is most often damaging, as failing to see the solution to identity problem.
Homo Sapience is about all these things.
Your thoughts? Your emotions? Do you feel like a little you riding around inside your head, the one which sights and sounds are presented to? Or, do you feel like your body? Do you identify as your body?
What's the difference?
Or do you feel like you are awareness, or consciousness?
The first seems like a disabling dualism. Attributing properties is what others do to you. I am complete with my consciousness, not separate from it.
Does consciousness happen TO you, or are you consciousness?
Never said it. Don't think i ever would.
That whole thing where we say, “we’ll figure out who this consciousness thing happens to later”, well that’s what this is about.
Homo Sapiens
Who are you, or more to the point, what are you?
DOne
Sculptor and Henry quirk, answer these questions?
It’s you who is squirming mate. I’m good, I know what I mean.