Please look. Change is the result of events happening sequentially.[/quote]bahman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2019 10:01 pmCome on, you are seriously NOT this stupid, are you?Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2019 1:44 amOkay. So if this is true, then you do not want me now to say any thing more on any matter at all, correct?
That is obvious: You already accepted that events cannot lay at the same point since otherwise, all events become simultaneous and there would be no change.Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:30 am
Okay, thank you for the correction and the clarification. Are you now able to back up and support what you say?
How is it possible and/or actual that this thing called 'time' ALLOWS change to happen?
What is the thing, which, if it did not exist, then there would be NO change?
So, what you are saying is obvious, IS, it is MY ACCEPTANCE, which is the thing that ALLOWS change to happen, correct?
If yes, then okay.
But if no, then what is the THING that ALLOWS change to happen?
Obviously the result, is NOT the cause of itself. Events not laying at the same point is the RESULT. I have been asking you what is the CAUSE that ALLOWS this 'change' happen? We both agree that change happens, so what do you say is the THING, which ALLOWS change to happen?
What you are more or less saying above is; because things do change this is what allows things to change. The absurdity and ridiculousness of this speaks for itself. What it is also speaks of and SHOWS is that you have absolutely NOTHING to back up and support your idea that 'time' allows change to happen.
The more you keep deflecting, the more you are just PROVING that what you believe is true, is actually NOT true at all.
As I say, if you want to claim some thing to be true, then it is best to first have some actual evidence to support your claim is actually true, BEFORE you express that claim.
All you have done so far is done all you can to avoid this the Truth, which IS; you have NOTHING at all to support your BELIEF and claim here.
Talk about being STUCK in one's OWN BELIEFS.
WHY would any one agree with you on this matter?
'Change' IS, the name for, 'events happening sequentially'.
Since when is a 'set of points' been known as 'time'?
If you say so, then it must be true, correct?
By the way, what you have said here does not follow logically, nor reasonably, as already pointed out.
All you need for change is physical things. Full stop.