Logik wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:52 am
Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:49 am
Am I REALLY the only one who can NOT see the alleged INFORMATION and EVIDENCE that has been so called "provided" by "logik"?
If "you" "logik" are NOT going to be of any help in presenting 'that" INFORMATION and EVIDENCE, then I will ask ALL of the readers to POINT ME to WHERE the one called "logik" has supposedly PROVIDED INFORMATION and EVIDENCE of WHERE EXACTLY I have a BELIEF.
Lancewing tried.
Atla tried.
TRYING is one thing. DOING is another.
If either of "them" have SEEN where ANY of "you" three have PROVIDED EVIDENCE, then FEEL FREE to PRESENT it AGAIN.
Let us SEE how many of you can be gathered up on your "side".
ALL you have to do is just write some thing like THIS IS THE EVIDENCE in capital letters if you like, then we will ALL KNOW that this IS THEE EVIDENCE of which you have been talking about.
By the way these two people and yourself have NOT provided any evidence, but what you three have provided instead is your own BELIEFS, which is not necessarily based any thing that has already been proven to be true.
For example the EVIDENCE for this is;
"atla" accuses me of being 'insane', (which I do NOT dispute by the way), for some view/ideas that I have NOT even shared yet, which "atla" then BELIEVES that they already KNOW what my views are, and it is this reason for WHY I am insane. But when I asked for EVIDENCE of what MY actual views/ideas ARE, "atla" has failed to provide any thing. All "atla" is doing is expressing their strong HELD BELIEFS. Just like "you" and "lacewing" do. "atlas" BELIEFS are based on "atla's" past exeriences.
I forget what "lacewing" accuses me of exactly for now. But I recall asking for EVIDENCE of this, but again NOTHING is provided. But the actual BELIEF that "lacewing" HAS and is HOLDING onto is clear as day, which is "lacewing" BELIEVES that I am proposing that there is only one way to obtain or reach some thing. Yet when I ask for the EVIDENCE for that BELIEF, none is forthcoming. This BELIEF is based on things from "lacewings" past experiences.
And, one of things that "you" accuse me of "logik" is that I have BELIEFS. Although you have NO actual evidence for this, and although I keep repeatedly asking for EVIDENCE, EVERY time you say I have a BELIEF, "you" "logik" keep FAILING to provide any. ALL "you" are doing is expressing that strongly held onto and maintained BELIEF that "you" do NOT want to let go of. This BELIEF, which you dearly LOVE, is ALSO based on "your" past experiences.
To recap the three of "you" are just expressing YOUR own BELIEFS, which are NOT proven facts, yet, and, FROM the examples just given and EVIDENCED above, neither of "you" are able to provide ANY thing to back up and support YOUR own BELIEFS, other than YOUR own BELIEFS.
Logik wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:52 amThe readers are no longer interested in your bullshit.
Is it ALL MY bullshit that they are NOT interested in?
Do you THINK that the readers are really interested in YOU continual diversionary tactics?
Logik wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:52 amNow lets see how you interpret their silence.
As either:
Could NOT be bothered doing any thing.
Could NOT be bothered searching for some thing that may or may NOT even be there.
Just wait and SEE what happens.
SEEING this more from one perspective than another.
Being completely OPEN and just LOOKING.
WAITING for you "logik" to present some thing. OR,
Could be a multitude of other things.
That is HOW I interpret their silence. How do "you" interpret their silence?
Logik wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:52 amYou are probably going to say something like "Look! None of the readers are coming forward. With any examples. Absence of evidence must be evidence of absence."
You are so predictable that this is beyond being humorous at the moment.
A completely WRONG ASSUMPTION AGAIN.
How many times can you make so many mistakes in just one little thread?
WHY would you even make ONE more ASSUMPTION, when just about absolutely every one of them as been SO WRONG?
Would you NOT prefer to just STOP making them in order so you do NOT look so predictably WRONG as often?
Do you KNOW what would make "you" LOOK less WRONG?
Here is one thing, Do you recall when you wrote:
Now lets see how you interpret their silence? If you do, then if you just left it at that, and just waited for MY response, without making ANY assumption at all, then you NOT be wrong at all. You would have been just OPEN, instead. THEN, you could have and would have SEEN what the actual and real Truth IS.
That is HOW simple and easy it REALLY IS to discover and SEE the actual and real Truth of things IS.
WHY NOT TRY that some time?