Bill Wiltrack wrote:...
Perhaps I did misunderstand the phrase, One study at UCLA indicated that up to 93 percent of communication effectiveness is determined by nonverbal cues.
I don't know...Perhaps you're right. So?
So all the babble you said about your images and non-verbal communication is wrong.
As John points out the article is concerned with actual face-to-face communication and how watching is just as or even more important than just hearing the words. Although what NLP says is that you should be checking that the words are congruent with the non-verbal communications.
In your case its just as interesting, as BB pointed-out your images upon her page show the confusion in your head when related to your posts upon mans inhumanity to the other animals.
The bottom line is that I am successfully using non-verbal elements to expand and increase our understanding of philosophy. Period.
The bottom line is that you are delusional if you think this.
Especially since you've not read any philosophy so have no idea what you are talking about other than your own pet-theory about what philosophy should be about, which as far as I can tell appears to actually be about a certain type of metaphysics. Still, it explains why you like the metaphysics of our more nihilistic and misanthropic posters.
You questioned my sincerity. ...
Which given your words is obviously insincere no matter how much you write "I respect ...".
Personally I think BB was just looking for a chance to flounce-off theatrically and you provided the straw or maybe she was truly an animal lover and found your images disturbing. Whatever, that you delude yourself that others were trying to get rid of her rather than just engage with her and that you came back to piss upon here thread shows the level of your thoughts. Not that I don't agree that BB could do with updating her approach as she never did get to a thesis nor a antithesis let alone a synthesis.