Search found 1319 matches
- Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:06 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
Are you just going to keep repeating yourself like a stuck record? Yep: There is no psychology involved and it takes only rudimentary philosophical skills to conclude that someone who whines like a little pissant at the slightest provocation is a whiney little pissant that loses their shit at the s...
- Sun Feb 12, 2023 10:31 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
My working hypothesis for why you did is that you are a whiney little bitch that loses their shit at the slightest provocation. My working hypothesis is that you are even more incompetent at psychology than you are at philosophy. I don't have to be good at either. There is no psychology involved an...
- Sat Feb 11, 2023 7:28 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
When you keep having to manufacture the criterion and the evidence after the fact ... I didn't manufacture the evidence. It was you who wrote this: You dumb, dismissive, uncharitable sophist! and this: You are supposed to shut the fuck up... and this: You want to suck the cock while getting fucked ...
- Sat Feb 11, 2023 1:53 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
You are still in the process of learning what your desired outcome is. Because you don't know! That's not entirely true. As someone who is familiar with the Socratic method, the desired outcome is partly improved critical thinking. Granted that's not very specific and I don't have particular target...
- Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:59 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
(given how much you like sucking Socrates' cock) Not as much as you: I think Socratizing the Socratizers is far more fitting as means to "unwind". See, you aren't even smart enough to realise I am mocking, not admiring Socrates (and his idiot-followers). Too good a joke to pass up. You'd ...
- Fri Feb 10, 2023 3:07 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
(given how much you like sucking Socrates' cock) Not as much as you: I think Socratizing the Socratizers is far more fitting as means to "unwind". Naturally. You simply aren't smart enough to have coherent and explicit criteria for smartness. Is it beyond you to realise that to work with ...
- Fri Feb 10, 2023 10:59 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
This is the crux of the criterion problem in epistemology: You have absolutely no idea what would convince you of anything. About anything. Socratizing the Socratizers doesn't work. But you want me to figure it out. You're a bit late. Socrates figured it out over two thousand years ago. In the spir...
- Thu Feb 09, 2023 8:47 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
...you are so dumb you can't even tell who you are winding up. You make it obvious when you say things like this: You dumb, dismissive, uncharitable sophist! Or this: You are supposed to shut the fuck up... Or this: You want to suck the cock while getting fucked by it too, eh? OK.. spread them chee...
- Wed Feb 08, 2023 9:28 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
120 on a good day. Get yourself a girlfriend; you get very wound up when you're unwinding. You couldn't even wind up a clock at this rate... Lets wrap this up. I agree with 120. 120 above yours. Well 120 points of a useless metric is useless. I suggest a more accurate measure of mental acuity: wit....
- Wed Feb 08, 2023 9:23 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Confirmation bias.
- Replies: 56
- Views: 1871
Re: Confirmation bias.
Realistically confirmation bias runs a spectrum from "not at all prone to CB" to "extremely prone to CB". The more prone to CB the more likely to not to learn from it. Ask yourself what characteristics make one most prone to CB. When I do that, the answers are characteristics I ...
- Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:33 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 5:58 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 5:38 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 5:29 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
...IQ is junk science. It's a meaningless number - a statistically unrigorous metric. But if you reject those preimises, and you accept the science then... you should totally bow down to my IQ. Which is actually above 170. Meaningless number or not, your IQ is not 170. Whatever you think of the met...
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 3:09 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Christianity
- Replies: 17085
- Views: 742037
Re: Christianity
I thought I grant myself a license with words, but seeing as you've put "reasoning abilities" on your license I've come to realise I am far too modest. Which again shows the strength of your reasoning abilities. Thank you. Sadly, you are in no position to recognize them. Metaphorically sp...