Philosophy Now Forum

The best of mathematics cannot be as realistic as the best of science. Note if rated in terms of reality, mathematics is 20/100 compared to science at 100/100 indexed as the gold standard. Science and mathematics describe different realities. Science is always about the physical universe. Mathemati...

the gold standard of 'what is real' is contingent upon the scientific framework and system [FS]. Science is a collection of stubborn observable patterns for which it is currently hard to find counterexamples. That collection is not a system. It has no pretense of systemic consistency. You somehow b...

I am interest to know: As a true believer, can you confirm you have entered into a contract ' ahd ' and ' mīthāq ' [divine covenant] with your God? If you are not sure, you can research or ask in a Q&A. I am interested in your personal take on the above issue. Also are you aware of the contract...

I stated "To insist perfect circles [illusory] exists as real is delusional." You attack mathematical realism, but your arguments are simply nonsensical. As such, while your Godel's Argument for God is mathematically true, that God is not real. You keep confusing "real" with &qu...

If it is 'real' then it can be deal with scientifically, either speculated or theorized based in the principle of empirical possibility. Historical facts are empirical but cannot be tested either. They are justified by witness depositions. Science is not the only method, even when it is about the p...

Once again, notice the contradiction. You agree that humans 'play' language games; you say that human intersubjectivity is the basis of what we call objectivity; and you say that humans have 'FSRCs'. But these are all fundamentally realist claims - about features of reality, including humans: 'thes...

That is your problem. Denying morality has an emotional element is why everything you say about morality is shit Morality is off topic to the original point. What you pointed out to PH is the existence of language games and intersubjectivity which is the basis of objectivity within a FSRC. It has t...

You state, "We are subjects yes, but also subjects of." Please explain subjects of, to what are we subjects? We are subjects of in the sense that we can't extricate ourselves from our perceptions and experiences to stand outside of them entirely independent of them. To say that biology is...

To insist perfect circles [illusory] exists as real is delusional. Mathematical realism is not delusional at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_mathematics Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind. Thus, huma...

That the Earth was round was not computed but earlier speculated and inferred based on empirical evidences and at present based directly in empirical evidences. Eratosthenes' approach was not scientific, simply because a scientific approach was not possible in his time. He did not have the option t...

Notes: KIV

Notes: KIV

The advantages Moral Objectivity has over moral subjectivity [relativity] moral skepticism, moral nihilism are as follows; Note: There are Two Senses of 'Objectivity' https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39326 1. The human-based-FSRC sense of objectivity 2. The absolute independen...

To exists as real, your God has to be physical at least in the physics sense which is not restricted to directly observable things but also the indirectly observable, e.g. gravity and other forces and powers. If the multiverse exists, it is real. However, how are you going to observe that from with...

To be exists as real, your God has to be physical at least in the physics sense which is not restricted to directly observable things but also the indirectly observable, e.g. gravity and other forces and powers. Science works like that, but mathematics does not. I will give you an example that scie...