Philosophy Now Forum

What is quoted above in the weird multicolors by yet another troll is EXACTLY what I have been saying! Our newest troll doesn't seem to grasp the point -- that no one will find his OWN clock ticking slow! Which is what the quoted material is ALSO SAYING! Sure, but that still doesn't mean that time ...

Nope, doesn’t work. You appear to be very quick to jump to a conclusion, which you seem to believe is absolutely true and correct. Do you have ALL the evidence, which you base your absolute statement on here? Or, are you basing that absolute statement on what "evidence" you say you have, ...

Lacewing wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2017 6:57 pm

ken wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:46 pm ...

Good luck to you. I'm not interested in investing any more in this.

Fair enough. You did not seem really that interest anyway in looking at all of this.

<snip> I gave you tons of links dealing with all your questions, and you have the nerve to ask for them again? If you really believe you gave "tons" of links, then that speaks for itself, and, if you really believe you gave them to "all" of My questions, then you are more blinde...

Asking ken for that TOE is about as pointless as ken continuously asking for a link to one specific test that he knows very well has not been performed. We all know he has no TOE. HOW do you KNOW that? I shall be very interested to see how you try and unite General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics....

I too would very much like to see ken produce this Theory Of Everything so can you do that please Yes okay. Make it as detailed as you can so that there is no ambiguity and also no need to ask any questions How long do you really think it would take one person to write some thing, like a theory of ...

All we know for certain is that if an interpretation or explanation fails to include time dilation, it is wrong. Okay. Well at least you, and some others, KNOW for certain some things. Does "we know for certain" mean that what we know for certain is absolutely true, right, and correct? An...

Also, are you aware that human beings have been giving whole pages, and whole books, of "information", for thousands of years, and continue to do so, supposedly "validating" various numbers of things? For somebody who regularly complains about assumptions being made of the views...

DNFTT davidm EXPECTS others to respond to davidm's responses, but this is all davidm can give in return. :lol: I've given you TONS of stuff in return, which you've IGNORED. TONS of stuff, or just some stuff? I have also replied to you, which you have also IGNORED. You're a TROLL. As everyone here n...

There is NOTHING that 'stationary' can be measured against so that would mean every thing is moving. This is wrong. Is it absolutely wrong? Anything can be considered stationary, The Truth IS absolutely any thing can be CONSIDERED. BUT 'what is considered' is NOT necessarily what IS . What is consi...

Saying that a clock ticks slower, supposedly with speed, I didn't say that. I used the words "a clock ticks slower" because others here have. What did you say then? Clocks are presumed to measure time. ANOTHER presumption. WHY NOT just look at what IS , instead of making more presumptions...

Why are they called falsification tests Does that some how give them more weight in their support of the thing that was said would happen Why not instead just do a test and just wait completely openly to see what ACTUALLY HAPPENS Trying to perform a falsification test or a verifiable test means tha...

atoms and whatnot, increases with velocity. In practice, this means that to accelerate such a particle requires increasing amounts of energy, until, at light speed, the energy required is infinite. But then there are theoretical tachyons that are said to travel faster than light. And the Cosmic Inf...

the Truth IS what is agreed upon and accepted by ALL. (Okay, so that’s what you're saying the Truth IS.) No, the truth is what it is, what all or most people believe is often wrong. I do NOT see any reference to human beings nor people here. But maybe because of the egotistical nature within human ...

Why are they called falsification tests Does that some how give them more weight in their support of the thing that was said would happen Why not instead just do a test and just wait completely openly to see what ACTUALLY HAPPENS Trying to perform a falsification test or a verifiable test means tha...