Search found 768 matches

by Cerveny
Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:09 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Open Question on Quantization of Gravity
Replies: 29
Views: 15557

Re: Open Question on Quantization of Gravity

Cerveny: Interesting. I think you're suggesting that something that appears to be a black hole, which is assigned infinite gravity according to current models, can have finite gravity. Or have I misinterpreted you? I only wanted to inspire for a new conceiving of gravity. The present one is counter...
by Cerveny
Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:02 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Open Question on Quantization of Gravity
Replies: 29
Views: 15557

photons' trap

No math helps you with Gravity if you do not understand the structure of physical space (vacuum) or unless you have an acceptable model at least :( Every attempt to describe some "Big bang" or some "black holes" is silly without it... Let us recall "Black-body radiation&quo...
by Cerveny
Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:01 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Open Question on Quantization of Gravity
Replies: 29
Views: 15557

Re: Open Question on Quantization of Gravity

No math helps you with Gravity if you do not understand the structure of physical space (vacuum) or unless you have an acceptable model at least :( Every attempt to describe some "Big bang" or some "black holes" is silly without it... Let us recall "Black-body radiation"...
by Cerveny
Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:52 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Another essay :)
Replies: 5
Views: 3118

Another essay :)

As for Vacuum, mostly interesting thing, worth studying, is the future/history phase border. Growing history (The Universe) crystalizes from a causeless phase, from the uncertain Future…. “Drops” of the future fall, blow and freeze to the cold history… Next, let’s imagine a neutron for example. It i...
by Cerveny
Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:45 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)
Replies: 16
Views: 10322

Re: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)

... We face certain "blowing" of the future towards to the history. QM describes some sounds/tones that are generated by such blowing. Imagine a flute. If we blow in it we get some (discrete) sound. If we blow stronger or if we change the finger (physical) configuration we get higher or t...
by Cerveny
Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:57 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Could hackers develop a 'computer virus' to infect the human
Replies: 1
Views: 1766

Re: Could hackers develop a 'computer virus' to infect the h

You do not need the hackers. The human has been already infected by the mass media. The human is being degraded toward the mediator, carrier of the capital :(

http://edge.org/conversation/infinite-s ... mark-pagel
by Cerveny
Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:51 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Gravity
Replies: 1
Views: 1806

The Gravity

We need a new comprehension of the gravity.
Let us say, for example: "An angular motion generates negative gravitational field" :(
http://wanna-be.in/pic/toroid.jpg
by Cerveny
Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:10 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Dawkins on "Why we are here"
Replies: 31
Views: 12942

Re: Dawkins on "Why we are here"

We are silly if we think we understand to everything :( There is certain under-sense communication between all live creatures that purpose is not known at all. (: who does not have appropriate experience see http://www.sheldrake.org/B&R/booksuk/index.html :) Frankly, we understand to the nothing...
by Cerveny
Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:33 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Dawkins on "Why we are here"
Replies: 31
Views: 12942

Re: Dawkins on "Why we are here"

Actually understanding the mechanism demands there is no purpose - that is the whole point. There are consequences, there is the effect of change, but not specific direction, though survival is the result - the result which gives the appearance of purpose to human minds that have a propensity to se...
by Cerveny
Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:31 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Dawkins on "Why we are here"
Replies: 31
Views: 12942

Re: Dawkins on "Why we are here"

Simplicity of evolution mechanism does not explain its purpose/aim.
You will probably answer "there is no aim".
But such claim is not possible to verify :(
by Cerveny
Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:44 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)
Replies: 16
Views: 10322

Re: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)

There is some common, general motion here in the Universe. There is no doubt about it. See inertial motion; see angular motion of stars; see growing ("expansion") of the Universe… see quiet (kinetic) energy of the matter. We face certain "blowing" of the future towards to the his...
by Cerveny
Fri Nov 25, 2011 2:51 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: God and Physicists.
Replies: 2
Views: 1918

Re: God and Physicists.

Notice interesting fact: - Vacuum does not contain any free charged particles; it contains only some dipoles. It does not lead electric current. But it can be polarized, strained: as by electrostatic field as well by magnetic (angular current) field. - Superconductor, on the contrary, does not conta...
by Cerveny
Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:34 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)
Replies: 16
Views: 10322

Re: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)

alex81 wrote:Nice discussion guys.. Socratus, would you please what dark energy is? Thanks
"Dark energy" is probably a result of wrong gravitational theory :(
by Cerveny
Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:48 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: We are surrounded by the duality.
Replies: 4
Views: 2419

Re: We are surrounded by the duality.

We are to admit we do not understand the Universe at all. Every popular attempts to explain it (relativity, strings) do it even worse. We need simple questions and simple answers. Do have some examples: - Does the future (prepared) exist? - Does the history (saved) exist? - Why and how is every spee...
by Cerveny
Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:42 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Genesis and Evolution.
Replies: 6
Views: 3600

Re: Genesis and Evolution.

Let us say the Evolution is "generalized" free motion...