Philosophy Now Forum

I'd like to ask the one who calls herself/himself 'Age' to cut the crap and lay her/his cards on the table. Does she/he think morality is objective - that there are moral facts - so that a moral assertion such as 'eating animals is morally wrong' has a factual truth-value and so can be answered dec...

Correct, and this is just because I 'know' what is Right, and, what is Wrong, in Life. You write that you "know", but what you have written so far, demonstrates a total lack of familiarity with the very basics of the theory of knowledge, i.e. epistemology. You clearly do not even know wha...

Look, you claimed that 'God/Allah's laws' are in the quran, I then showed and proved how, when, where, and why this is False It is not possible to prove that a particular foundation of basic beliefs such as the Quran is true or false. The goal of an axiomatic system is to prove from such basic beli...

:D :lol: :lol: Notice and see how these posters here will not just answer very simply asked clarifying questions, at all, because even if they attempted to with lies or deceit, then they would still end up contradicting "themselves" and/or being hypocritical. So, imagine if they, let alon...

This sanctimonious loon being an example. Who that is referring to noone else knows, as it could be that one "itself". Anyway, only human beings describes things, as can be seen here once more. So, until this one expresses, clearly, who, exactly, those words were intended for, they could ...

All I can say is that each person, inside of their mind, and with their imagining faculty, will visualize what I so often refer to as a "metaphysical reality" according to their interpretive means and equipment. Even the absolute atheist does this, in my view. Yes, everyone has their own ...

The following is a quote from Christopher Dawson's The Historic Reality of Christian Culture: A Way to the Renewal of Human Life (Routledge, 1960) I read this book some years back and it has very much influenced my outlook. As it happens -- and this note goes out to all who participated in the Chri...

You think you’ve refuted Gödel. How do you 'know' that "leomota" only 'thinks' that it has refuted "godel"? After all "leomota" might actually 'know' that it has refuted "godel". Just like the one that 'knew' that it had refuted the 'geocentric' view or belie...

I have written a book refuting Gödel, so far no one has been able to counter my argument. Basically, he took an x not belonging to himself. However, there is nothing that does not belong to itself; he should have at least demonstrated the existence of such an x. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CS8SX7KW...

Like everything else in the Christian ideaology it is absurd and contradictory. If this is 'the way' one 'looks at' and 'sees' something, then 'this' is all they will 'see', and the 'only way' they will 'look'. For example, could the word 'God' not be what you 'see' It as? Or, could 'heaven' and 'h...

1. I do not do 'theory'. So, this obviously includes 'moral theories'. Therefore, I do not have nor use 'moral theories', let alone have my 'own' 'moral theory'. Fine. In that case, you do not have any opinion on what is right and wrong. Correct, and this is just because I 'know' what is Right, and...

Okay, but just so you become fully aware I was not even thinking about, let alone ever talking about, some so-called 'soundness theorem'. Of course, I did not mean to say that you actually know what you are talking about. You obviously don't. In case you are not yet aware one has to actually be thi...

Adult human beings, back in the 'olden days' when this was being written, would, instead of just 'looking for' what it was that was 'in agreement' they would rather believe that their own individual views, beliefs, and perceptions were the only true and right ones, and so would spend all of 'their ...

And, as I have been pointing out here that document is where what is actually just made up by human beings is very, very Wrongly and Falsely passed off as 'God's rules or laws' ... Where is your own moral theory and your own database of jurisprudential rulings? I am not interested in what you claim...

Not that this has anything to do with 'morality' and how what makes 'morality' 'subjective and what makes 'morality' 'objective', but anyway, the word 'science' can mean and refer to, the study of things, which is not a thing in itself but is what you human beings do. And, the word 'physics' can mea...