Philosophy Now Forum

Not sure what you mean by this sentence. There is no such thing as "intelligence". I assume you don't mean 'there is no such thing as intelligence'. And I'm guessing you mean there is no such thing as artificial intelligence.- But then the second half of the sentence..implies that once we...

Until we understand that there is no such thing as "intelligence" (as we define it) AI will be little more than a parlor trick. The reason that we haven't already made great strides in scientific understanding created by the internet is that we are starting with bad assumptions and definit...

The Real and True or irrefutable phrase or term is; 'There is 'thought', therefore 'I' am, or 'I' exist'. Everything that exists exists without thinking except our species. This is axiomatic to all other consciousness and forms a less than poor axiom alone. If I don't believe your species exists or...

Considering the size of the Universe, Itself, and how long It has been around for, what you just said and claimed here is a pretty big claim, especially considering how Truly little and insignificant you, and that species, really are here. you have been around for 'how long', exactly, and know 'how...

I have also pointed out and mentioned this here in this forum a few times already about you adult human beings. Children are far more adaptable. Now, why, exactly, do you believe that absolutely none of you human beings could exist/operate without having nor holding onto preconceptions, themselves?...

But why would you human beings, or so-called 'homo omnisciencis', even want to begin to believe such a thing as this? Nobody, least of all scientists, want to begin with the conclusion. But our brains have been reprogrammed with a language that requires it. In order to "think" about anyth...

What is the difference between the 'science', which you claim is wrong, and, the 'true science', which you claim can not be wrong? The science that is wrong is the models and interpretations. Experiment can't be wrong per se. So, all is logic, except for you and your species, alone, right "cla...

Science is wrong. Or more accurately every single paradigm is wrong. True science is experiment and experiment can't be wrong.

There are no laws of nature and no God's law. All is logic except homo omnisciencis.

If you have beliefs, which get in the way, then why have and keep beliefs? Why not just get rid of the beliefs you are keeping, and then just not have any more? I call our species "homo omnisciencis" because we each believe we individually and collectively know everything. Rather than see...

Who's a little know-it-all? :| I know nothing at all. I have merely deduced the formatting of science and reality from experiment. Others will have to fill everything in. I'm not so little. But I have discovered all this through coming to understand thought which I began when I was very little. Obv...

I think physicists just use their knowledge to knock each other off their podiums because if they only open up two slits then they don't get a wave. Maybe a wave is what it will take. The decline of physics is sad, we don't understand space, time, matter :( Is it "sad"? We've used physics...

Normal children need to start being taught metaphysics at the age of 3 at the latest. When they begin asking "why?" to every answer, this is a metaphysical question and they need answers they can understand. But even at much younger ages they should be taught the fundamental aspects of sci...

People are extraneous an redundant, now. And most of them are working and procreating machines, some people know that XD. Right now the very wealthy are using robots and all sorts of any means by hook or by crook to get all the money. What I'm suggesting is that their work will be more easily accom...

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
What do you mean by "proper philosophical language?"

Language which isn't so easily confused.

We need a stable language with some strict definitions so that we can build on the work of those who came before.

We should be very afraid. Not so much because it will want to take over but because humans aren't very smart and robots will be far better at it. Indeed, humans will become extraneous and redundant unless we change our perspective on the nature of being human in advance. We must come to realize that...