Search found 758 matches

by Bernard
Mon May 30, 2016 11:48 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Nietzsche and the eternal return.
Replies: 45
Views: 13406

Re: Nietzsche and the eternal return.

But he used it as a 'formula' - a philosophical device - as well as in a poetic sense.
by Bernard
Mon May 30, 2016 5:42 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Nietzsche and the eternal return.
Replies: 45
Views: 13406

Re: Nietzsche and the eternal return.

There is no evidence at all he contracted syphillus, this was a beat up by one of his first biographers, who was antagonistic toward him. Modern research points toward a long acting tumour of the brain behind his right eye, or a possible genetic brain disorder (his father had something similar).
by Bernard
Mon May 30, 2016 1:34 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Nietzsche and the eternal return.
Replies: 45
Views: 13406

Re: Nietzsche and the eternal return.

His romantic drives had no other course beside that of sublimation, whether scorned or not. This inevitably embittered him to some extent, as it would anyone, but he rode it well on the whole. I think the unfinished nature of his eternal recurrence idea bespeaks an attitude of humility toward the li...
by Bernard
Sun May 29, 2016 10:24 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Nietzsche and the eternal return.
Replies: 45
Views: 13406

Nietzsche and the eternal return.

Nietzsche used the idea of the eternal return as a device for upholding his ideas and passions. Its as if he didn't really care to examine the idea very closely, if at all. It was like a melody he heard and loved so used it in his prose and poetry. I think he should have looked at it more seriously.
by Bernard
Fri Mar 13, 2015 3:03 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Kierkegaard or Nietzsche?
Replies: 59
Views: 17729

Re: Kierkegaard or Nietzsche?

Both had syphilis - whatever syphilis did to their thinking is no longer relevant to our thinking - we have antibiotics.

Our thinking these days is, how shall we say it, less syphilitic and more antibiotic.

Breath
http://www.leonardsax.com/Nietzsche.pdf
by Bernard
Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:01 am
Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
Topic: The Philosophy of John Lennon
Replies: 13
Views: 4263

Re: The Philosophy of John Lennon

Nice Article and observations, like: "What if we accomplished the hardest transformation of all and overcame our possessiveness? Notice that Lennon says imagining no Heaven is “easy if you try” and imagining no countries “isn’t hard to do,” but as for imagining no possessions, “I wonder if you ...
by Bernard
Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:53 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: When did the universe begin?
Replies: 7
Views: 2848

Re: When did the universe begin?

The link is no good. Simpler questions are the moe difficult, such as why is space black. This does little for me: http://www.amnh.org/education/resources ... radox.html
by Bernard
Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:18 am
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: 5 Questions About The Bible
Replies: 16
Views: 5229

Re: 5 Questions About The Bible

1. What is the Bible? A rather desperate recourse for those lacking good literature, with some interesting enough stuff in it. 2. Should the Bible be read? Why/why Not? Nothing SHOULD be read, though an unwritten 11th commandment would have it otherwise. 3. What is Bible doctrine? Mountains out of m...
by Bernard
Sat Sep 06, 2014 11:52 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: What started the Big Bang?
Replies: 51
Views: 13558

Re: What started the Big Bang?

I think the universe is maybe another creature of some sort; like a man , an atom, an ant or a star...whatever. Infinite creatures... that's existence. I don't know what type of creature a universe is. It may be just an aspect of some creature like the ocean is an aspect of earth. We look out and se...
by Bernard
Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:54 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Which came first: the chicken or the egg?
Replies: 79
Views: 20761

Re: Which came first: the chicken or the egg?

The questionn is flawed because it doesn't identify either the specific chicken or egg referred to. Generic chickens and eggs only exist within language. How specified would you like it? Suppose you make the specification you would like. PhilX The items of language belong only to language. The item...