Philosophy Now Forum

This thread is about Pantheism vs Panentheism. I am including Deism as a side reference. Deism, pantheism and panentheism all shared the same belief, i.e. God exists but there are differences between them. Here's ChatGpt views [with reservations]; Sure, let's break down the differences between deism...

There is a significant difference between Pantheism vs Panentheism; From ChatGPT as above; Deism: There's a distant Creator who set things in motion but doesn't intervene. Pantheism: Everything is God; there's no separation between the divine and the world. Panentheism: God is in everything, but the...

Deism, pantheism and panentheism all shared the same belief, i.e. God exists but there are differences between them. Here's ChatGpt views [with reservations]; Sure, let's break down the differences between deism, pantheism, and panentheism in simple terms: Deism: Idea in a Creator: Deists believe in...

In the OP, the reference to 'free will' is "relative free will", not the contentious absolute free will.

All humans has relative free-will to do whatever the want within qualified conditions.

I always qualify my OPs with the following default; Discuss?? Views?? (if missing in any of my posts, it is an omission of my default intention). So, just discuss and express your views. If anyone do not like my views, just give your counter views or balanced views or ignore it. It is childish to gi...

" Notes: T.B.A " or "Notes: KIV" is for my personal interests. As I had stated, my participation in this particular forum is for my own VERY SELFISH reason to refresh or add-to what I have learned in my knowledge database. I am indifferent to whether my discussions and posts bene...

Omission:

As for deists [ pantheists, panentheists]......
edited to:
As for deists [and also pantheists, panentheists]......

Notes: T.B.A.

There are differences in Morality between Theism and Deism. Emphasis re theism is on Christianity and Islam since they are about 4.5 out of the 8+ billion at present. Be fair, guy. I said: I reckon the one who designs, creates, and mebbe sustains the whole of reality does decide what constitutes rig...

Be fair, guy. I said: I reckon the one who designs, creates, and mebbe sustains the whole of reality does decide what constitutes right & wrong, as fact. You, as a free will, get to decide whether you'll abide or defy. Whether we're talkin' Jehovah or Allah or Crom, we're talkin' about The Crea...

Notes: T.B.A.

Here is my argument why Christianity's Morality* is Objective, but its degree of objectivity is negligible, i.e. say, like, 0.0000001/100 relative to scientific objectivity. * this is related to specific moral elements within morality [as defined]. Despite that we cannot deny it has contributed sign...

Oh. My mistake. I thought there was an argument for moral objectivity, which must rely on a non-circular description of moral rightness and wrongness. 'X is morally right/wrong because ...' For example, 'Murder is morally wrong because ...' Now, that's supposed to be a moral fact, so there's a fact...

IC describes his team's god - one of the thousands invented by our ancestors - as 'the Source of all goodness' and 'the Author of all goodness, health, light, hope, joy, truth and peace'. (Giving common nouns, such as source, author - and god initial capitals is always impressive.) Of course, IC's ...

There are electrical potentials flowing from high to low, but that is not language. When you turn a switch to turn on a light, there are flow of electrical impulses but we do not regard that as 'language'. There are flow of electrical impulses between potential within slugs and other organisms [eve...