Philosophy Now Forum

Why do you feel that trading sex for money is an insult?
Female philosopher, tell me, answer me. Don't lie.

Why do you feel ashamed? I applaud your deception and lies. You did well, got what you wanted, and left him in the dust. You are cold blooded and I admire that about you. I just don't care much about wealth, am not superficial, as you are. I'm not shallow, nor depend on wealth as my strength. You do...

Some, including whores, will gladly sell their body, sell their sex, for money. Because they believe, falsely, that money is power.
There are other forms of power in the world, money is only one of them. Allemotion has exposed herself as a lover of money, and she is willing to lie to get it?

You slipped a little bit, allemotion. Your mistake is in thinking I value wealth. You accuse me of something you are guilty of . Wealth is valuable, to you, not me. My will to power is toward other avenues, like knowledge, information, and wisdom. Money means very little to me. Information means mor...

You want me to prove that you divorced your ex-husband?
Did you not say just that? Or, do you admit lying? This is simple.

Evolutionary theory is an artifice applied to natural selection.
Selection is the reality, evolution is the theory.

Do you want to talk about lying or not, allemotion? Are you at your limit already? You can't handle philosophy, since you can't handle these questions honestly, without lying, to yourself first.

You're lying, allemotion. That's what you excel at. You convinced your ex-husband that you "loved" him, didn't you? When all you really wanted , was his money? Let's talk honest. Let's talk truth. Isn't this what you wanted, honesty, truth? Or is it only "true", when it flatters ...

You bring up a good point, allemotion, your claim that you "know" me and "see" me. How? You're a woman, and you see emotions. You don't see or understand reason, logic, thought, all the basic ingredients of philosophy. So, how do you "see" me? Do you see my thoughts? Do...

If anyone proposes breeding humans, artificially, against nature, then this represents something anti-natural . What is this, and why is it necessary? Why is breeding humans necessary, when natural selection already results in distinct races, people, societies, and cultures? Natural selection is abo...

reasonvemotion wrote:You hate because I "see" through you. I see the type of men you truly are and I tell you.

I'm not the one who married a Jew, divorced him, for his money. And you really want to discuss "lying", honestly? Start with being honest to yourself, coward.

Kuznetzova wrote:Well no clearly it does require myth and dogma and explanation. And that's not me interpreting you, that's you in your own words!

I'm not the one arguing for natural selection, you are. So artificial breeding goes against your premise, not mine.

Thermonuclear weapons don't discriminate on the basis of sex, race, ideology, nor age. Nuclear weapons kill men, women, children, toddlers, the old, the athletic, the strong and the weak all equally well. Your superior Nordic pagan genes will not stop a blast that is capable of vaporizing concrete....

"Breeding" is not natural selection. Breeding is artificial selection. Artificial selection has a goal to make the kernels of wheat stalks larger, or make dogs swim better. So tell, us Atthet, do you think NATURAL selection has a goal? How about a direction? Does evolution have a directio...

This paragraph is a jumbled mess -- indicating very muddy thinking. Perhaps you wrote this in haste, or maybe you were very tired (or drunk). Your first sentence refers to some sort of extrinsic, objective inferiority. But then the second sentence says it is a "judgement directed against an ot...