Philosophy Now Forum

I wrote all my message, and I get this without explanation! I was very nervous in imaging the answer, and I get a little unexplained sentence! I think it is Lol, (for some). Yeah, I believe to know what you are referring about. In the search about logic, I was redirected to Philon de Megare; he had ...

Hi All! I would like to share this site about logic with you: http://www.courvoisier-thevenaz.ch/logic/logic.php and sorry if you find the english as being "robotic", the guy, as me, are french-speaking in maternal language - but I think the site remains understandable. It appears that the...

Yes, I agree. There is important things here, cartesian space. Miles thinks that the non-cartesian spaces are fallacy, (but I have some more further reading to do). And... the narrative. As I was influenced by physical or chemical principles meaning that the way between a beginning and a result had ...

Leo, It seems you read pretty fast the two preceding articles ;) Oh, they really merit that we pay attention on them. I cannot say at this time that all Mthis' results are necessarily true, and I know this is really astonishing that a single man - even genius - could achieve so many deep works. But ...

Hi Obvious Leo, I have also not read your synopsis, but will do. Thank you already for this remark: Let's get something straight here, nix. This is a philosophy forum and not a physics forum and thus the rules of engagement are somewhat different. You are not amongst a priesthood of self-satisfied g...

Okay, I read his three articles mentioned above. Miles Mathis redefine electromagnetism, as a variety of gravity - An "emergent property" of gravity would be a more precise form of language. Hi Obvious Leo, I thought you was searching the detail too much, and did not accord his importance ...

Thank you, and wow... I don't really know where to begin an answer. Oh, yes: First of all, I answered PhilX as I felt he needed. When I write that he will find answers, I am not really thinking about stated answers. Questioning is the beginning of answering, and very generally the answer is in the q...

To generate the observed electron magnetic moment the surface of the ball would have to move at faster than the speed of light. This is not possible... Thanks. But replacing a real spin with zero spin does not help anymore ? Nature has two types of particle Fermions (spin 1/2, 3/2,5/2 etc) and Boso...

many problems are only a complicated translation of a solution. Indeed. One of the drawbacks of being an intelligent species is that we have the ability to find problems where no problem exists. We often look for complex solutions to simple problems where the real solution is hidden in plain sight....

nix wrote:To generate the observed electron magnetic moment the surface of the ball would have to move at faster than the speed of light. This is not possible...

Thanks.

But replacing a real spin with zero spin does not help anymore ?

If a lion conceal to get the prey, animals cheat everytime! A lion does not show his teeth to the prey 300 meters in front of it, since this last one generally goes faster. But animals don't have law, except the one of the "stronger", so in a way, as you write, they don't cheat. The only o...

Philosophy Explorer wrote:I think many problems, individuals can resolve on their own if they only try. What do you think?

PhilX

Yes,

many problems are only a complicated translation of a solution.

So far it's the consensus of scientists that it started off with the Big Bang which then leads to other problems (e.g. what happened before the Big Bang? How do we get all the mass/matter into such a tiny space from which the universe started?, etc.) I begin with the second example of question: I t...

Nix, I isolate for you my 2 central points: Technetium is unstable whatever its isotope we consider, and I am afraid that a model representing a bag of badly defined bullets cannot. Mathis could explain why Technetium is unstable whatever the isotope we consider, nothing less !! -And the second is m...

His nuclear "physics" is even worse crap than his atomic physics! Clearly the product of a disturbed mind. He ascribes the nuclear force to gravity which becomes large at the nuclear scale. This is not in accord with nuclear scattering experiments at all, or any of the known properties of...