Search found 150 matches

by nameless
Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:31 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A Philosophy of Mind
Replies: 2591
Views: 660142

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Yes but not for protection . p.s. If it was, why would this not be a 'willful' act? If its not then it must be a 'willful' act? No, of course not 'for' protection (poorly worded), perhaps as protection, or, different coloration happens at moments of decreased predation (correlation rather than caus...
by nameless
Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:56 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A Philosophy of Mind
Replies: 2591
Views: 660142

Re: Philosophy of Mind

... Poetic, but that doesn't make a chameleon who changes its coloring for protection... The problem with this fact is it's not, as the chameleon does not do this. Are you saying that a chameleon does not change coloring? Or merely arguing my poor wording? I'm willing to eliminate "for protect...
by nameless
Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:10 pm
Forum: Introduce Yourself
Topic: Hello to everybody
Replies: 7
Views: 3505

Re: Hello to everybody

So far, your english is better then some of our native speakers!
Welcome.
by nameless
Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:50 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Circle
Replies: 29
Views: 11516

Re: The Circle

The same cognitive error is applicable to '1/3'. We all know what a third of something is, one of three equal divisions. A beam balance can divvy up 1/3 ounce of gold rather easily. 3 (volumetrically and massively) = parts. Yet when we decimalize one third, we find the problem. There cannot ever be ...
by nameless
Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:28 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A Philosophy of Mind
Replies: 2591
Views: 660142

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Nameless,...you cannot define what philosophy is If you had read any of my posts, you would have noticed that I have defined philosophy as 'critical thought' . If I myself believed that I knew what I was talking about: declaring the truth about matters of such high interest, So do almost everyone. ...
by nameless
Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:05 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A Philosophy of Mind
Replies: 2591
Views: 660142

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Ahhh.. Heh.. loquacious yet loveable! Hmmm...

(You can 'name' me if you like, just between us! Shhhhh...)
by nameless
Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:02 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A Philosophy of Mind
Replies: 2591
Views: 660142

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Isn't there a Guinness Record Book category for the most words uttered in a thread by any one person, on a forum with no quality control?
Or perhaps medication is in order?
Or both?
You certainly have my vote!
by nameless
Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:48 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Circle
Replies: 29
Views: 11516

Re: The Circle

Perhaps the point of the circle (yes, circles can have 'points', and 'points' can be circles!) is not the 'circleness', as there are many kinds (as many as perceptions thereof) of 'circle'.
Perhaps the point is how many 'points' can exist within that circle?
by nameless
Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:31 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Circle
Replies: 29
Views: 11516

Re: The Circle

Its a nice thought but would it not be an example of a 'perfect' ring rather than a circle? As it has a third dimension from this perspective. The 'ring' is in the form of a perfect circle. Think, also, metaphor. The map is not the territory. Perfection is in the eye of the beholder. I perceive all...
by nameless
Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:37 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Circle
Replies: 29
Views: 11516

Re: The Circle

Its a matter of Perspective.
The following illustration is a side view of a "perfect circle"!


___________________
by nameless
Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:48 am
Forum: Introduce Yourself
Topic: Hello As Well
Replies: 3
Views: 1990

Re: Hello As Well

Welcome, Dog.
by nameless
Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:31 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Do you believe in Physics ?
Replies: 10
Views: 5245

Re: Do you believe in Physics ?

Conclusion from some article : ‘ One of the best kept secrets of science is that physicists have lost their grip on reality.’ Just precious! * __- In my opinion to understand the paradoxes we must reconsider the old basis of the Physics. Already done and moving on. If you learned and understood som...
by nameless
Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: On the Assertion That All Observation is Theory-Laden
Replies: 13
Views: 5032

Re: On the Assertion That All Observation is Theory-Laden

I'm sorry, but all observation is not theory-laden (whatever you consider "laden" to mean). Since you seem to reiterate my point in this, that observations are not theory-laden to any decisive degree in the natural sciences. Or anywhere else... This means that the scientific community is ...
by nameless
Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:19 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: On the Assertion That All Observation is Theory-Laden
Replies: 13
Views: 5032

Re: On the Assertion That All Observation is Theory-Laden

nameless It's my belief that children have limited possibilities for own theories and thus they make the observations. I am equating your 'observations' with my 'perceptions'. That is who we are, what we do, perceive. We are Conscious Perspectives. From the moment that we 'earliest' perceive life, ...
by nameless
Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:48 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: On the Assertion That All Observation is Theory-Laden
Replies: 13
Views: 5032

Re: On the Assertion That All Observation is Theory-Laden

Do you have examples where people get more acute rather than dull when they are observing? Sometimes neither. Sometimes there are no observed thoughts. Sometimes an observation is simply an observation with no thought involved. 'Theories' are 'thoughts'; no 'thought' = no 'theories' Are you relatin...