Search found 5304 matches
- Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:28 am
- Forum: Local Discussion Groups
- Topic: Humanists
- Replies: 48
- Views: 41483
Re: Humanists
Hello. I know that This is very old post but I want to say that Humanists are atheists and agnostics who make sense of the world using reason, experience and shared human values. Right .... what is an atheist and agnostic that doesn't use reason, experience and shared human values? That would be a ...
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:39 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
- Replies: 1888
- Views: 386111
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
I have for a time been sympathic to the Atheist claim of believing in something close to science, but here's the limit! It can hardly be said that Atheists can believe in Ethics/Morals and Meaning for real. Atheists are undeniably going to write those sizes off as psychological compulsions! What ca...
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:39 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
- Replies: 1888
- Views: 386111
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
I have for a time been sympathic to the Atheist claim of believing in something close to science, but here's the limit! It can hardly be said that Atheists can believe in Ethics/Morals and Meaning for real. Atheists are undeniably going to write those sizes off as psychological compulsions! What ca...
- Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:10 pm
- Forum: Introduce Yourself
- Topic: Heya all, i would like to introduce myself
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4602
Re: Heya all, i would like to introduce myself
Thank you Van De Merwe Hi, I have a philosophy on life and i wrote a book about it. I never studied Philosophy. Out of all the philosophers Socrates is my man. I wrote the book and i dedicate it to the greater good of mankind and to my sister Angela who took her life in July 2008. I offer the book t...
- Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:34 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Scientific Paradigms are NOT true
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11993
Re: Scientific Paradigms are NOT true
Kuhn is going down! Argument developing against Kuhn. (This is "imported" from http://forums.philosophyforums.com/ where it can be found in the Phil. of Science section with the same title. It has been posted there Sep 20, 2009 01:28 PM.) :) The object of this thread is clear. It's to mak...
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:38 pm
- Forum: Book Club
- Topic: Review: Rousseau's Dog
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10176
Re: Review: Rousseau's Dog
Just finished Rousseau's Dog by David Edmonds and John Eidinow. I enjoyed it but not as much as their first pop history of philosophy book, Wittgenstein's Poker . This book is an account of the relationship between David Hume and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Hume saved Rousseau from his persecutors on th...
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:27 pm
- Forum: Book Club
- Topic: Atlas Shrugged
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4180
Re: Atlas Shrugged
I thought this was a Philosophy Forum, not the whinging of a novelist
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:24 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Modern Physics: “ I DON’T know what I don’t know.”
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3599
Re: Modern Physics: “ I DON’T know what I don’t know.”
Never forget the symmetrising words of Slavoj Zizeck when he completed Rumsfeld triad of knowability (known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns) by adding the all important and frankly more interesting "unknown Knowns". These are the unrecognised endemic assumptions and taken-for-...
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:19 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: On Time and Archaeology
- Replies: 128
- Views: 48748
Re: On Time and Archaeology
The concept of historical progress of mankind cannot be sundered from the concept of its progresion through a homogenous, empty time. A critique of the concept of such a progression must be the basis of any criticism of the concept of progress itslef. Walter Benjamin. History has always treated the ...