Philosophy Now Forum

It seems that we can, but I don't have the mathematical tools to prove such a proposition and it seems suitable for philosophical discussion and debate. What say you to this?

PhilX

I already know that Aleph followed by a number characterizes the relative size of some infinite set. Let's start with Aleph 0. Aleph 0 is characterized by the set of natural numbers. Aleph 0 is also characterized by set of nontranscendental irrational numbers. Why? Because the set of nontranscendent...

Does it take more evidence to change a principle or theory of science than to establish it?

PhilX

I have an interest in recreational math of which my interest is strongest in magic squares. So I'm checking to see who may have an interest in this as well?

PhilX

Think about it. What would we use to measure the movement of time? Time itself? I think that time is preoccupied.

If you don't use time, what then? What would qualify to measure the movement of time?

PhilX

Hello everyone, In case you find my handle too long, you can refer to me as PhilX. I live in the US. My interests are science (mostly recreational math), computers, chess, team sports and other areas I'll reveal from time to time. As I don't know that much philosophy, you'll probably find me refresh...