Search found 767 matches
- Wed Dec 20, 2023 3:00 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
Please forgive me, Albert Einstein fans, but I'm afraid that by promoting the idea of infinitely fine physical space mathematical genius paralyzed physics for a hundred years and gave birth to some really crazy theories, sorry… 2) Or some kind of "dark matter"… It is enough to consider ...
- Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
Please forgive me, Albert Einstein fans, but I'm afraid that by promoting the idea of infinitely fine physical space mathematical genius paralyzed physics for a hundred years and gave birth to some really crazy theories, sorry… 1) For example, how can a reasonable person seriously works with the ...
- Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:36 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
Please forgive me, Albert Einstein fans, but I'm afraid that by promoting the idea of infinitely fine physical space mathematical genius paralyzed physics for a hundred years and gave birth to some really crazy theories, sorry…
- Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:00 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
… Why should there be anything in between "matter"? BECAUSE if there was NOT, then there would ONLY BE One 'thing', ONLY. Namely, One solitary piece of 'matter'. And, OBVIOUSLY, there IS NOT JUST One 'thing', NOR solitary piece of 'matter', ONLY. I would say that there is only that which ...
- Sun Dec 10, 2023 3:56 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
Sorry, but there is no such thing as an absolute "nothing" and therefore cannot be measured or compared. The common "nothing" has meaning only in context, as a complement, the opposite of "something" real. Absolute "nothing" has meaning only as the content of ...
- Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:38 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
The only question is whether the "crystal" of the growing/condensing/crystallizing Past/Histoty (of physical space/ether/vacuum) is composed of ordinary elementary particles (electron/positron lattice? - "Epola"?) or some "stem" elementary particles (Higgs?)… But the p...
- Wed Nov 01, 2023 8:44 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Science is dead!
- Replies: 54
- Views: 6899
Re: Science is dead!
The decline of physics is sad, we don't understand space, time, matter :(Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:21 pm I think physicists just use their knowledge to knock each other off their podiums because if they only open up two slits then they don't get a wave. Maybe a wave is what it will take.
- Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:35 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
- Replies: 164
- Views: 98293
Re: Aether it exists, or it doesn't.
… yes, the universe is a condensing, growing (crystallizing) “time” block of ether (of the past). The elementary particles are defects in this "crystal". The past crystallizes from the future, from the (not yet causal) "plasma" of the stem cells of the ether... forget, please, a...
- Fri Sep 08, 2023 7:06 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Dark matter
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6013
Re: Dark matter
There can be no greater indictment of modern physics than its failure to describe the motion of the stars in the galaxy. Fortunately, we "understand" the mechanism of life of "black holes" (irony)
- Mon Sep 04, 2023 7:51 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: The Paradox of Physics
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3939
Re: The Paradox of Physics
In a way, you are right about something. "Self-referential loops and permanently influencing mutual relations in the microworld are the essence of its undulations and oscillations, the permanent search for stability (wave / quantum mechanics)... Why would the universe search for stability? So ...
- Sat Aug 19, 2023 10:23 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: The Paradox of Physics
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3939
Re: The Paradox of Physics
The fact that things result in a self referentiality leads to a further paradox of disorder and order. On one hand the self-referential nature of things results in a perpetually stable loop relative to other self-referential things. On the other hand if all there is at the macro level is a loop the...
- Mon Aug 14, 2023 11:53 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: The Paradox of Physics
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3939
Re: The Paradox of Physics
In observing atoms we affect atoms***: 1. The tool used to form atoms is in itself composed of atoms. 2. The atoms of the tool affect the atoms that are being observed as the tool creates the boundaries through which the atoms are observed. 3. An experiment is atoms affecting atoms and creates a se...
- Mon Jul 24, 2023 6:00 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: The Paradox of Physics
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3939
Re: The Paradox of Physics
In observing atoms we affect atoms***: 1. The tool used to form atoms is in itself composed of atoms. 2. The atoms of the tool affect the atoms that are being observed as the tool creates the boundaries through which the atoms are observed. 3. An experiment is atoms affecting atoms and creates a se...
- Mon Jul 17, 2023 3:10 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: (Growing) Block of Universe
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2537
Re: (Growing) Block of Universe
Will this have plate tectonics? And by plate I meant a force in addition to the ones listed acting out, causing the causality to cause? A unmoved mover of sorts? When I think about the growth of a block of Universe (of the past), I believe that its " surface tension " is related to the us...
- Sat Jul 15, 2023 7:08 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: (Growing) Block of Universe
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2537
Re: (Growing) Block of Universe
What about the Hairy Ball Theorem? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairy_ball_theorem Wouldn't that mess with your theory of 3D present point topography via causality, if that's 4D time.... because it would induce relativity independent of causality. A second type of causality. I used the shape of ...