Philosophy Now Forum

Wrong forum. Belongs in political philosophy forum.

VA:

Like I said in the other thread: your dissent into your irrationality has become too much to bear.

You can't provide any evidence that the Universe exists either. And yet... As with most who deny the possibility of God on the grounds of lack of evidence, VA does not understand what evidence requires (boundaries) or what it entails (limitation). Infinity has neither. If you want to believe in God...

You can't provide any evidence that the Universe exists either. And yet... As with most who deny the possibility of God on the grounds of lack of evidence, VA does not understand what evidence requires (boundaries) or what it entails (limitation). Infinity has neither. Bounded rationality - it's a ...

Don't waste your time. The moment you counter his arguments he resorts to ad hominems and rationalisation. If your falsifiers lack "substance and depth" apparently they are no good ;) Either he's practicing Cunningham's law and not saying it, or he suffers from incurable bigotry. I gave u...

You are nutting your own nutty claim that God exists as real when you cannot provide evidence at all. You can't provide any evidence that the Universe exists either. And yet... As with most who deny the possibility of God on the grounds of lack of evidence, VA does not understand what evidence requ...

I will, when you make one. All you given is your opinion. Re God is an impossibility I have presented my argument here; God is an Impossibility https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=24704 If you want to prove God is real, it is so easy, Just call your God to be present at locatio...

I would be interested in hearing how you would argue QM could make my conjectures untenable. Nevertheless regardless of how you argue, there is no way you will be able to prove God is real based on the general principles as I had mentioned earlier, i.e. I specifically stated that proof is out of th...

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:52 am

Reflex wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:37 am What makes you so afraid to admit you’re not infallible, VA?

Where did I claim I am infallible?
Avoid strawmaning.

Would appreciate if you could concentrate in providing counters to my arguments.

I will, when you make one. All you given is your opinion.

logous VA: The most successful and most tested theory in history makes your conjectures untenable. How? Shall we discuss the logical implications of non-locality and quantum tunneling? Whatever the most successful and most tested theory in history and being empirical-rational, it will not be able to...

VA: The most successful and most tested theory in history makes your conjectures untenable. Depending on the context they could be used synonymously; or they could be used to mean different things. You get to decide. And if you intend them to mean different things - you get to tell us what the diffe...

What makes you so afraid to admit you’re not infallible, VA?

Then show your proofs and arguments? Ever hear of QM? I believe we have gone tru this before. QM theories are scientific based theories. According to Karl Popper, scientific theories are at best polished conjectures. Therefore a QM-based God is thus based on conjectures . So there is no reason to b...

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:55 am

Reflex wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:47 am

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:10 am
Nope.
The idea of God is not related to anything empirical but only based on pure thoughts only.

I wouldn’t bet on it if our you.

Then show your proofs and arguments?

Ever hear of QM?

A philosophical concept can be abstract and it is related to something empirical. So God is a philosophical concept even by your standard (such as it may be). Nope. The idea of God is not related to anything empirical but only based on pure thoughts only. :lol: I wouldn’t bet on it if our you.