Philosophy Now Forum

‘ QT . . . ,we do not understand the theory as fully as we should. We shall see in what follows that important interpretative issues remain unresolved. They will demand for their eventual settlement not only physical insight but also metaphysical decision ’. / ‘ Quantum theory’ by John Polkinghorne ...

Hi , ‘Arising_uk ‘ I read your profile and saw you interest in Philosophy of Mind What is about this small article? God and Consciousness If God exist, HE / SHE/ IT must be in every place it means in human brains too Question: is it possible to prove this ? I will try Our brain works on dualistic ba...

How so? Socratus. p.s. Please accept this in the spirit it is intended, i.e. helping someone refine their good grasp of another language. "It is strange and unexpectedly to read this, but I am agree." The beauty of English is that I can understand this but there are more correct ways to s...

Arising_uk wrote:

socratus wrote:What does Philosophy expect from modern Science ?

Technology and facts, some ethics and morals,
some awareness of epistemology and metaphysics as applied to their theories,
and for many metaphysicians support for their pet theories.

It is strange and unexpectedly to read this, but I am agree.

What does Religion expect from modern Science ? What can modern Science learn from Religion ? What does Philosophy expect from modern Science ? Philosophy expects Science to butt of its affairs. The Supreme Being expects both Science to Philosophy to bow before Him in awe. And Science being only a ...

What does Philosophy expect from modern Science ?
====================

What does Religion expect from modern Science ?
What can modern Science learn from Religion ?
===========================================

Interesting thoughts Socratus, being that my current read is Parallel Worlds by Michio Kaku. =========================== I think there are two Worlds: Vacuum and Gravity. What was before Vacuum or Gravity ? Does Gravity exist in Vacuum or vice versa? == . Fact and Speculation. 1. Fact. The detected...

The tangled SRT. ==== . Dr. Kanda wrote: The whole SR is complete nonsense. Socratus. The Einstein’s SRT is right but its interpretation isn’t correct. Why I say so ? Dr. Kanda wrote: ‘ The question is asked What is v in the Lorentz transformation? ‘ Socratus. The Lorentz transformation uses two kin...

Different points of view. 1. In Physics we trust. / Tarun Biswas / and plus millions of other believers . 2. Science is not always as objective as we would like to believe. / Michael Talbot. / and plus few others. 3. Religion or Physics ? Faith or Knowledge ? / some doubtful people. / 4. Science and...

Physics & Religion. / My opinion / ‘ The idea that the universe can be viewed as the compound of two basic orders, the implicate and the explicate, can be found in many other traditions. The Tibetan Buddhists call these two aspects the void and nonvoid. The nonvoid is the reality of visible obje...

The masses in the Universe are very few. The distances between stars are very far. About 99% of the matter in the Universe is unseen. Nobody knows what it is. But God using his > 99% Hidden mass of the Universe take control over the < 1% Visible mass of the Universe. He is a smart physicist and math...

Philosophy of Physics. / My opinion. / After reading some scientific ideas: The more I study the more I know The more I know the more ideas I have The more ideas I have the more they abstract The more they abstract the less I know the truth And therefore conclusion from some article " One of th...