Philosophy Now Forum

I think my new concept lies first and foremost in description . How one wants to balance out the numbers of strong/weak interactions for making a credible calculation of the new "gravity" is of less importance I think, because the world stays the same and gravity also stays the same, at ap...

His workplace is indeed the Perimeter Institute, http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/index.php?lang=en! Cheers!

If I'm able to formulate laws of nature expressed in formulas? YES! Clearly, the convention of physics says 4 forces of nature: Strong Interaction, Weak Interaction, Electro-Magnetism and Gravity. I say: Strong Interaction, Weak Interaction, Electro-Magnetism and by either or combination of Strong I...

Some more words on my "Opinions on Physics": My angle to solving or providing a better explanation of gravity can be considered Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong or either of them as purely magnetic force (thus constituting gravity) and holding off Electromagnetic force to itself (by th...

Some more words on my "Opinions on Physics": My angle to solving or providing a better explanation of gravity can be considered Cascading Effects of Weak and Strong or either of them as purely magnetic force (thus constituting gravity) and holding off Electromagnetic force to itself (by th...

Every measurement happens in the present, thus a neutron can't be measured "from the future". And as we measure, the very signal of this measurement still carries with it the present, even though you like to write "the past". Just this. I'm not interested in making points/"p...

Let me remind you that a point is indeed without extension no matter what . Indeed, per definition it is without any dimensions whatsoever! Thus, as a point in time is "now", it's equally without any extension in the split/distinction between past and future! Conclusion: one is certain in ...

I'm sorry. I've forgotten to write it's a prediction of mine. :) Based on the facts that no more severe breaches of the nuclear reactors' vessels will occur and that all other factors remain stable, i.e., no disruptions to the vessels incl. widening ruptures esp. to reactor nr. 2 and so on. Cheers! :)

Good news and progress: it seems now that a good deal of the radioactive fuel has burnt out, I think. That the radioactive levels we have now never will rise any higher. Cheers!

Quantum physics and Special Relativity contradicts our life experiences.

I contest this! If they are properly described, they can't contradict our life experiences.

Thank you. We'll see what the experts say! Are you following this crazy Japanese drama too? Please follow CNN, BBC and all other media. (But not too much or you grow fisheyes... )

I have two new inquiries today: what happens when you "pull" out a rod/radioactive material out of the "bath"? And to what degree can the container room/vessel room take any increased heat in case there is such heat from pulling out the radioactive material? Any operating manual,...

Apart from the crisis as such and rather a nuclear technology question: does anyone know whether it's right to lift the radioactive material out of the water or if it's the right thing to submerge the radioactive material with water/seawater? I may think they may be doing the wrong thing, that the r...

I think indeed that Chernobyl is the worst that has the possibility to happen and that we are now seeing nuclear power plants that has a much more efficient safety/security policy and that the amounts of radioactive material (beyond what is merely present in the reactors) is nicely controlled so tha...

The handle on the wave forms is indeed the probabilistic theories, both statistical and prediction (by the assumed predictions that are based on numbers by assumptions). No?