Philosophy Now Forum

I give up on it, chaz wyman. Back to the topic of a physics representation of telepathy theory-wise! Cheers!

I'm only interested in giving "telepathy" a representation in physics insofar as it exists. Its existence will not be discussed in this topic by myself, at least! Let me try, chaz wyman for your two word phrase: "I am"? 149 guesses left? Either way, your reply reminds me of this ...

I can speculate that the nature of particles are not so confined as we may think and thus that these particles "by a kind of erratic behaviour" can effectuate "telepathy" to the extent that "telepathy" exists. This means that, instead of walking the confined lines of se...

My answer is that Black Holes are sufficiently defined (by their "circles", where the Black Holes start to be black, the rims of them) to consider them defined (as opposed to tacky). This is in relation to an ongoing discussion that has encumbered my brain for a while now. I'm not sure wha...

The whole: "On the Distinction Between Cheap Psychology and Expensive Psychology" I would like to point out the distinction between cheap psychology and expensive psychology! Some people call themselves "people with great insights into psychology" and thus represent a kind of Fol...

By IBB: "Where did you read anything about this "Dirac stream"?" I can't say exactly where I've read it, but I've originally thought of it as an example of observation bias where one group of scientists are able to see the "Dirac-stream" and another group has been unabl...

A little note to this topic: The Dirac stream! I've come aware of the Dirac Stream in physics and some people claim that it's possible to see and other people don't. Even detectors and other data on it are unavailable! So my assertion in this regard is this: I'd say that the Dirac Stream is this str...

On the Status of Social Science, Political Science and Psychology. I've written earlier an answer to Thomas Chr. Wyller where I've mentioned the new sciences of social science, political science and psychology and in this regard made a somewhat derogatory comment that I don't think they exist for re...

Apart from the view on Psychiatric diagnostication elsewhere, I start this topic just to see where it goes (or just for the f*ck of it)... nicely alongside the other... Diagnoses: It's my view that Psychiatric diagnoses are in fact best categorised by the two sides (of two) of Schizophrenia and Depr...

I heartily welcome your reply, Mike Strand! I've actually expected more of these replies to writings that I think are well founded already. But so be it, such is the exchange of ideas in our world.

I don't want to add anything either at this point, but it may be that I cite you! Cheers!

My point is that "heat" is not as simple as heat only, there may be these alterations of mass by receiving light (as opposite to Sun when it loses mass by radiating light (by nuclear reactions)). You get this?

Cheers!

My theory is that the (standard object by 1 kg of) iron will as you say, very correctly radiate infra-red waves and thus release photons of this kind in return, but that's only half the story. You can measure this by several detectors. One (set of) detector(s) that can give a number on "escaped...

Further: The experiment on photons. Even though bending the light and making inferences by strength of light (Watts/W) or by the place in spectrum (wave-length, greek letter), one should do a parallel. The parallel follows. Concerning the mass of the photon, Wikipedia states it to be <1×10^−18 eV (1...

...and no blowing of white smoke or mystic diagnostication. Here comes: Mental illnesses are generally scientifically determined by and pathologically defined by the functioning level of the case in question, being the functioning that is defined by ALL parts of a normal life, i.e., social, work, pe...

Welcome by me as well! Enjoy! I hope you find this site pleasing as I do!

Cheers!