Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 8:38 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:04 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2023 12:02 pm

In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

The "all".

you seem to be MISSING THE MARK, or JUST MISUNDERSTANDING, here.

How can I miss the mark when things just are?

The 'reader/s' who can SEE that you have NOT ANSWERED the QUESTIONS. If the 'can' word here was meant to mean 'an', then the ANSWER IS NO one. I was just ASKING you ANOTHER CLARIFYING QUESTION, which, by the way, you just, ONCE AGAIN, 'tried to' DEFLECT AWAY FROM. And who are the reader(s)? The one...

26. The order of an event is ascribed only after the event occurs and as such it, i.e. the observation of order or the order itself, cannot be differentiated as either an actual objective state or a subjective interpretation. This reverse nature to order necessitates it as a projective quality with ...

24. A previous order has to disintegrate so that a new order may occur with this new order being the adaptation of the old due to the introduction of new contexts and/or problems. It is this introduction of new contexts/problems that shows the previous order as having very little footing other than ...

Here is ANOTHER one who thinks or BELIEVES that by just responding with letters to A QUESTION is ANSWERING the ACTUAL QUESTION posed, and ASKED. ONCE AGAIN, 'responding' is NOT necessarily ANSWERING the ACTUAL QUESTION. As you have PROVED True in other posts and above here. And what do you mean by ...

The fact that the mystery deepens through empirical inquiry by the senses and understanding, does not negate their importance. Although much becomes known, there is yet wonder to feed a hungry mind. The above simply does not make sense. If I see a forest and focus deeply what it is composed of I ob...

WHY do you PRESUME that just LOOKING or FOCUSING 'deeply' INCREASES 'complexity', or that by doing so there is some so-called 'increase in complexity'? If one can NOT see 'the forest for the trees, NOR see 'the trees for the forest', then that one is just NOT LOOKING Properly AND Correctly. By the ...

'That', which can NOT be refuted. So, OBVIOUSLY, 'we' can NOT get ANYWHERE 'reasonable' here. Which ones, SPECIFICALLY? 1. And what do you mean by cannot be refuted? Can NOT be proved to be False NOR Wrong. Disproved. 2. Seeing both sides of the coin, truth and untruth, is entirely rational. Okay, ...

For the record the only major detail we are disagreeing with is "no-thingness/nothingness"... 1. Boundaries. A thing is that which has boundaries (or definition if you prefer that word). 2. To say "the sum of all thing is the sum of all things" is to make a statement of equality...

Identity is the experience of the organism's constitution in relation to its context/environment, it's conditioning is its identity. Experience is a context thus we are left with a revolving wheel of contexts when dealing with identity. Which came first the organism or the inorganic? I would say ne...

LNC must be described as (A=A)=/=(-A=-A) considering all variables are subject to LI. However this leads to a contradiction as LI (A=A) is not equivalent to LI (-A=-A). From another perspective LI must be equivalent to LI and can be expressed as (A=A)=(-A=-A). However this reduces to A=-A which in ...

LiNk must be described as sausage link doesn't contradict patty which is also composed of noncontradictory pork have we now found the missing link? But the term "sausage" is surely problematic. What about beef sausages? Chicken sausages? Come to that, the Prussian statesman Otto von Bisma...

In observing atoms we affect atoms***: 1. The tool used to form atoms is in itself composed of atoms. 2. The atoms of the tool affect the atoms that are being observed as the tool creates the boundaries through which the atoms are observed. 3. An experiment is atoms affecting atoms and creates a se...

alan1000 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 12:46 pm Oh, for heaven's sake. The "Douanier Rousseau" approach may work well enough in modern art, but when you going to study some science and mathematics?

And when are you going to actually apply a thoughtful argument, or are you just going to accept the status quo without question?

In observing atoms we affect atoms***: 1. The tool used to form atoms is in itself composed of atoms. 2. The atoms of the tool affect the atoms that are being observed as the tool creates the boundaries through which the atoms are observed. 3. An experiment is atoms affecting atoms and creates a se...