Philosophy Now Forum

Mr. Olivarez asks, why ? The answer is simple. Walker is quite right—the answer is simple: “But the Justice Department told the Supreme Court this month that additional barriers the state erected had effectively prevented the Border Patrol from being able to determine whether a migrant in that area...

Walker is confusing the House Republicans' bogus investigations of Biden with Trump's real crimes and misdemeanors. There's nothing bogus about the accusation of covering up his payments to Stormy Daniels. Nor the election interference phone call he made to Raffensperger. Nor the flagrant unauthoris...

Trump isn't being persecuted—he's being prosecuted.

It's not for being Republican. It's for the crimes he's been accused of.

It's not by the Democratic Party or by Biden. It's by duly appointed federal and state prosecutors. like Jack Smith

Just saying.

Blinken tells this to Netanyahu, and is interfering with Israel’s government, because the Democrat Party That Hates America is not on Israel’s side, as noted in the best-selling non-fiction book, The Democrat Party Hates America . LOL Is anyone else wondering what "is not on Israel's side"...

Is there no end to this litany of MAGA-deranged whining from Walker? He’s not likely to run out of quotes from America-hating polemicists any time soon. Do you think we should take turns to check in on him once in a while in case he does himself some harm, or should we just close the door of his pad...

Everything in that post of Walker’s is wrong—probably because the author hates America.

Now that the slumbering giant Senator John Fetterman (D) has awakened, it turns out that he is a traditional liberal, which makes him an enemy of The Democrat Party That Hates America, The Party that is the current iteration of Marxism, adapted to conditions that are manifesting at this time in the...

QED, I think.

I think you are misusing the words “unbound”, “thing”, “quality”, and “exist”. Do mathematical sets exist? Are they things? And what do qualities have to do with Cantor?

No, That is your thesis, not mine (hence the conditional “if”). I’m just along for the ride.

If the existence of the unbound thing is logically impossible that would mean its creation is not within God’s power. We are wandering further and further off the topic of Anselm’s ontological argument, because you haven’t anything more to add.

I think now you are stringing words together just to appear still to have something more to say.

Yes, or in other words, there is nothing, within reason, that God cannot do. That’s nothing with a capital 0 .

Not if you know what the word “omnipotent” means.

There is no stone, dude.

[snide redundancy removed]