Search found 6172 matches
- Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:40 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: FSRK = Language Games?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 577
Re: FSRK = Language Games?
This is like a theist who insist to the non-theist, I will not discuss the contradictions in the Bible with you unless you believe God exists as in the Bible. So far, I have reread one round of On Certainty and few secondary texts [book and articles]. I have extracted the relevant paragraphs that s...
- Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:18 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
- Replies: 191
- Views: 20489
Re: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
I understand meta-ethics is the study of theories and terms of ethics in a balanced and unbiased manner. However, in this case you are biased and hold strongly to various views which imply you hold such personal beliefs, i.e. you personally denial and do not accept there are moral facts. So you hav...
- Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:05 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What could make morality objective?
- Replies: 9752
- Views: 1024997
Re: What could make morality objective?
It is true nobody [that I know of] here who are into ranking seriously. The listing sorting and ranking games you play are pointless. The numbers you make up out of thin air to justify them are meaningless and measure nothing. The whole thing only matters to you. This problem isn't going to go away...
- Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:57 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: "Oughtness to Breathe" a Fundamental to Morality is Objective
- Replies: 89
- Views: 1278
Re: "Oughtness to Breathe" a Fundamental to Morality is Objective
The oughtness in 1 is not a moral nor prudential ought, it is a biological ought. Lol. What the fuck is a "biological ought" supposed to be? Your intelligence and knowledge is limited. Remember you mentioned ' meta-ethics ' - the study of ethical theories and terms. While actual biologist...
- Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:50 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What's W 'On Certainty' Main theme?
- Replies: 51
- Views: 744
Re: What's W 'On Certainty' Main theme?
Here is where Excel comes in handy. List the philosophers in one column and analyze their main philosophical stance across various columns, e.g. realist, anti-realists, analytic, etc. Note what I did with 6236 verses of the Quran in Excel. What you did with the Quran was very mad. What you describe...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:23 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: "Oughtness to Breathe" a Fundamental to Morality is Objective
- Replies: 89
- Views: 1278
Re: "Oughtness to Breathe" a Fundamental to Morality is Objective
There are a few philosophers who talk about biological oughts. I find it difficulkt to process. If the ought is neither goal directed nor the result of duty or a similar brand of moral direction, how is it directed towards something? By what means is it a source of motivation? The way VA decribes t...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 1:44 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Social Constructivism
- Replies: 16
- Views: 240
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:27 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: "Oughtness to Breathe" a Fundamental to Morality is Objective
- Replies: 89
- Views: 1278
Re: "Oughtness to Breathe" a Fundamental to Morality is Objective
Lol. What the fuck is a "biological ought" supposed to be?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:53 am The oughtness in 1 is not a moral nor prudential ought, it is a biological ought.
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:43 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
- Replies: 191
- Views: 20489
Re: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
What paper?? You are whining and complaining about nothing you know about. I quoted the claim in the OP from; HOW TO BE A MORAL REALIST Richard N. Boyd 1982 Chapter 9 in Essays on Moral Realism (Cornell Paperbacks) 1st Edition by Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (Editor), https://www.amazon.com/Essays-Moral-R...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:50 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What's W 'On Certainty' Main theme?
- Replies: 51
- Views: 744
Re: What's W 'On Certainty' Main theme?
Here it is, the ideas as related to the list of philosophers; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Western_philosophers If you have read widely you would have understand what each of the majority of philosopher's ideas are. That's not a list of ideas, it's a list of philosophers. Frege only ge...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:16 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: FSRK = Language Games?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 577
Re: FSRK = Language Games?
Did you reread W's On Certainty with a consideration of my FSRC? If not in alignment, why? Absolutley no need to waste a bunch of time on that. I told you I would re-read it if you show signs of having actually read and understood it. So far you are only showing signs of delusions of grandeur. This...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:00 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What's W 'On Certainty' Main theme?
- Replies: 51
- Views: 744
Re: What's W 'On Certainty' Main theme?
Say if we list down all the full range of Western philosophical ideas from 800 BCE to the present [2024], which is the ones you align with the most with its relevant weightages [not the useful of weightages you condemned]? The fact that this notion makes sense to you is why you will never understan...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 8:32 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: FSRK = Language Games?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 577
Re: FSRK = Language Games?
You [FDP] asked me to refer to A C Grayling's video re Wittgenstein, but according to Kusch, Grayling is in the pro Epistemic Relativism and Practice camp which I argue aligns with my FSRC; Nothing written by anyone except you aligns with your KFC-buckets. You have laden that thing down with so muc...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 8:31 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: FSRK = Language Games?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 577
Re: FSRK = Language Games?
Absolutley no need to waste a bunch of time on that. I told you I would re-read it if you show signs of having actually read and understood it. So far you are only showing signs of delusions of grandeur.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:08 am Did you reread W's On Certainty with a consideration of my FSRC? If not in alignment, why?
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:58 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Sex and the Religious-Left
- Replies: 830
- Views: 11196
Re: Sex and the Religious-Left
That was utterly self-serving even by your standards