Search found 8595 matches
- Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:07 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Contradiction of the Point
- Replies: 80
- Views: 24423
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
1. Facts are relative to the observer thus are subjective. Not exactly... Facts are objective. But how the person reacts and responds to the fact, is the subjective part. The object is outside the subject, not within it, as your statement implies. The nature of objectivity being observed as shared ...
- Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:06 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Contradiction of the Point
- Replies: 80
- Views: 24423
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Are you here DISPUTING, or 'trying to' REFUTE, the Fact that you are NOT ANSWERING my ACTUAL QUESTIONS ASKED? Also, stating Facts is NOT necessarily A 'belief' AT ALL. Okay, and when you USE the 'rational' word, what is 'this' in RELATION TO, EXACTLY? 1. Facts are relative to the observer thus are ...
- Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:04 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Universal Consciousness
- Replies: 143
- Views: 21188
Re: Universal Consciousness
But I do NOT state 'all is one'. 'you' ALSO are OBVIOUSLY CLEARLY MISSING and/or MISUNDERSTANDING what I am ACTUALLY SAYING here. But WHY 'you' ARE DOING 'this' can be CLEARLY SEEN and thus is ALREADY KNOWN. So all is not one? Or is it? In regards to 'what', EXACTLY? The "all".
- Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:04 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Universal Consciousness
- Replies: 143
- Views: 21188
Re: Universal Consciousness
NO. Now, WHEN are you going to ANSWER the ACTUAL QUESTION I ASKED you? Or, are you just going to KEEP 'TRYING TO' DEFLECT? Who said the questions weren't answered? The 'reader/s' who can SEE that you have NOT ANSWERED the QUESTIONS. Who says I owe you can answer? If the 'can' word here was meant to...
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 8:54 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Translucense
- Replies: 76
- Views: 14001
Re: Translucense
22. The totality of being is formless as it has no comparison, with comparison being required for form to occur through contrast (i.e. a standing apart), otherwise if it were to have comparison it would not be the totality as something would be beyond it. Comparable, or rather contrasting (i.e. stan...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:52 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Translucense
- Replies: 76
- Views: 14001
Re: Translucense
21. The continual progression of a thing, through repetition, necessitates a thing coming from nothingness as the repetition of this thing results in little variations, little distinctions, that occur spontaneously as the thing progresses in time and space. The continual progression of a thing resul...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:28 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Existence Is Infinite
- Replies: 272
- Views: 12911
Re: Existence Is Infinite
It is ONLY 'you' here who says 'this', "daniel j lavender" . AND, you HAVE TO SAY 'this' to keep 'it' aligned WITH what you currently BELIEVE is ABSOLUTELY true. That existence is formless and infinite? Not quite. Eodnhoj7 seems to agree: 1. Agreed . To put it in other terms: the totality...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:24 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Existence Is Infinite
- Replies: 272
- Views: 12911
Re: Existence Is Infinite
1. And this sum of all things is without comparison for if there where comparison it would not be the sum of all things. Without comparison there is no contrast and without contrast we cannot have definition, i.e. thingness What do you mean “cannot have definition, i.e. thingness”? The totality its...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:12 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: Logic: Where Correct Thought and Correct Sense Contradict
- Replies: 61
- Views: 13021
Re: Logic: Where Correct Thought and Correct Sense Contradict
'That' what establishes a Fact or the Truth. Do you have a DIFFERENT meaning for the 'proof' word? Okay. Do you have 'proof' of THIS CLAIM of YOURS here? If this is JUST what I am doing here, TO you, then okay. I HOPE you are NOT GAINING CLARITY FROM 'questions'. I FOUND CLARITY COMES FROM 'answers...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:10 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Contradiction of the Point
- Replies: 80
- Views: 24423
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
WHAT do you ASSUME or BELIEVE is my so-called and alleged 'belief' here? Is 'this' YOUR so-called, and alleged, 'rational claim'? 1. My inability to answer your questions. Are you here DISPUTING, or 'trying to' REFUTE, the Fact that you are NOT ANSWERING my ACTUAL QUESTIONS ASKED? Also, stating Fac...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:08 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Universal Consciousness
- Replies: 143
- Views: 21188
Re: Universal Consciousness
I have NEVER even thought i am one with all things, let alone said or claimed 'it' anywhere. Then you cannot state all is one. But I do NOT state 'all is one'. 'you' ALSO are OBVIOUSLY CLEARLY MISSING and/or MISUNDERSTANDING what I am ACTUALLY SAYING here. But WHY 'you' ARE DOING 'this' can be CLEA...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:07 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Universal Consciousness
- Replies: 143
- Views: 21188
Re: Universal Consciousness
'Assume', suppose to be the case , or more or less, just guessing as being true , without actual proof. 'Believe', accept as being true , again also maybe without actual proof. Are you assuming and/or believing these definitions? NO. Now, WHEN are you going to ANSWER the ACTUAL QUESTION I ASKED you...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:06 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: The Paradox of Observation
- Replies: 84
- Views: 17852
Re: The Paradox of Observation
The fact that the mystery deepens through empirical inquiry by the senses and understanding, does not negate their importance. Although much becomes known, there is yet wonder to feed a hungry mind. The above simply does not make sense. If I see a forest and focus deeply what it is composed of I ob...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:06 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: The Paradox of Observation
- Replies: 84
- Views: 17852
Re: The Paradox of Observation
Okay. If this is what you BELIEVE is true, the 'this' MUST BE TRUE, correct? 'It' MIGHT. If you say so. Is it REALLY that HARD and/or TO COMPLEX for you to just ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed and ASKED here? The questions have been answered, is it really hard for you to comprehend them? Here is ANOTHER...
- Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:05 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: The Paradox of Observation
- Replies: 84
- Views: 17852
Re: The Paradox of Observation
The fact that the mystery deepens through empirical inquiry by the senses and understanding, does not negate their importance. Although much becomes known, there is yet wonder to feed a hungry mind. The above simply does not make sense. If I see a forest and focus deeply what it is composed of I ob...