Philosophy Now Forum

Some of that is true, but you say "I'm bright enough know who the Big Guy is." You don't know who the Big Guy is, and you are not bright enough even to follow your own logic. Joe Biden. Again: The evidence is compelling, but not conclusive. You have jumped to a conclusion; that is why people like y...

Again, I must respectfully disagree. It's your right to do so. Respect is nothing if it isn't mutual. Out of respect, I have answered every question you have pressed me on. Now I am pressing you on this: You complain that 'the MSM' didn't report a story that, as I pointed out, was all over Fox, AON...

I'm bright enough know who the Big Guy is. You are not. The evidence is compelling, but not conclusive. You have jumped to a conclusion; that is why people like you don't make it through law school. That statement is why people like you are cowards and intellectual shysters. Conclusive evidence is ...

Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:18 pm I'm bright enough know who the Big Guy is.

You are not.

The evidence is compelling, but not conclusive. You have jumped to a conclusion; that is why people like you don't make it through law school.

Dateline: June, 2020 Subject: Nationwide rioting aka protests. Speaker: Kamala Harris “They’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop. This is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not gonna stop. And everyone beware because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna let up and they should not....

Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:26 pmNo, my intelligence defines me.

Presumably you are offering this as evidence of your intelligence:

Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:26 pmYour cowardice defines you. (It's quite typical, and easy to spot.)

It doesn't suggest that you are in any way remarkable.

Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:19 pmYour ignorance does not define me

No. Yours does.

I don't think that many people who might have been swayed by the Hunter Biden laptop story were not aware of it I do. Again, I must respectfully disagree. As I said: You complain that 'the MSM' didn't report a story that, as I pointed out, was all over Fox, AON, Newsmax and many other conservatives...

However, the instant media denial of Antifa’s presence before the data could have been examined ... This is typical of the sort of rumour/conspiracy that those for whom the truth is inconvenient will make up so that not very bright people will demand that someone else disproves it. The 'damning evi...

there was no universal condemnation of blm/antifa and there still isn't Don't hold your breath. No issue ever gets universal condemnation, anymore than another gets universal praise. Some people believe that black people have as much right not to have their neck knelt on until they die as white peo...

However, talk of Trump will still be irrelevant to any discussion of the case. Even if we grant him to be guilty of every charge his worst detractors make of him, that will not wash anybody else of their guilt. That much is patently obvious. No, we all stand or fall on what WE do, not on what someb...

The right-wing media, like Fox, has adopted an intentional model that is modeled on the rag mags. It attempts to hold a straight face without ever giving in to this illusion making it impossible to determine if they are NOT being truthful. I think two of the most influential people in 20th century ...

Since you have no affinity for Donald Trump, you will not mind me pointing out that his success as a politician is based on his understanding and manipulation of that point. It will be as irrelevant as the rest of your message. But more predictable. That's just rude. In another thread you say this:...

Yeah, but I talk to who I want to talk to. Others are free to observe, or even to interject, but I choose who I want as my audience when I write. That's my prerogative as writer. That's your prerogative, too. But you can't choose my audience for me. If you don't know the difference between talking ...

You should bear in mind that in the context of our exchanges, I am not the audience. Yeah, for me, you are. No I'm not. This is a forum, not your private pulpit. So, back to the point: It is the broader debate between press and politicians in which we are both largely spectators. It is you that has...