Search found 319 matches

by Aetixintro
Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:31 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.
Replies: 2
Views: 1283

Re: Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.

But it does so by the category... whether it's symbolic or a (proper) name. :)
by Aetixintro
Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:28 pm
Forum: About the Magazine
Topic: issue 83
Replies: 4
Views: 3970

Re: issue 83

I'd like to add my "thank you" as well! Great service, indeed! Cheers! :)
by Aetixintro
Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:01 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.
Replies: 2
Views: 1283

Over Principia Mathematica by B. R. and A. N. W.

Out of 'I know nothing and my set is empty! Can you call illusions knowledge? I don't think so! What is it to know? I have absolutely no idea! To "know" has been assigned to me! Thanks, Russell, for pointing out the danger of having a single proposition of knowledge!' TL (I think this quote has been...
by Aetixintro
Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:29 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
Replies: 64
Views: 16143

Re: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...

:roll: The Copenhagen Interpretation is indeed a set of (definite) requirements to the world of physics. I think you need to get sharper, you, mister or miss! :) [Edit, unsp.:] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation ... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrg...
by Aetixintro
Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:35 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
Replies: 64
Views: 16143

Re: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...

You about that... Apart from that, it should be noted that Schrödinger's Cat is much cited in relation to Schrödinger's theory/theories, but I hereby encourage people to investigate this themselves. Schrödinger's Cat is also not necessarily hypothetical, it may be that they have done it, one version...
by Aetixintro
Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:23 pm
Forum: Book Club
Topic: The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism
Replies: 2
Views: 2073

Re: The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism

I happen to agree to Popper, it seems. Thanks for the tip of the book! :)
by Aetixintro
Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:07 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
Replies: 24
Views: 5886

Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!

If you still think I'm wrong show me your reference for Earth's "magnetic gravity" field. Not it's magnetic field and not it's gravity because they're different things. 2 urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field You're one sloppy a**, mr. Clever...
by Aetixintro
Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:38 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
Replies: 24
Views: 5886

Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!

I know you didn't see it in school because: there is no experiment that can demonstrate it; you've been unable to say what the experiment was; you have actually provided evidence that it can't be demonstrated experimentally. I know that magnetic fields exhibit a north and south pole. I'm not disput...
by Aetixintro
Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:40 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
Replies: 24
Views: 5886

Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!

Quantum effects have already been mentioned on the thread but you said you'd seen the bending of light with magnetism in a school experiment and you didn't. What do you know about what I've seen in school experiments? You don't know jack* about that! Cut the crap! However, that aside, where's your ...
by Aetixintro
Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:16 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
Replies: 24
Views: 5886

Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!

You should read the text!
by Aetixintro
Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:08 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Bending light by electro-magnetism!
Replies: 24
Views: 5886

Re: Bending light by electro-magnetism!

My qualification is this: I have been reading Lee Smolin's "The Trouble With Physics" (by Penguin Group, 2006) and Roger Penrose's "The Road to Reality" (by Vintage Books, 2004). I have also studied physics all the way through upper high school, 3 years, for the Norwegian equivalent of GCSE Science ...
by Aetixintro
Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:55 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...
Replies: 64
Views: 16143

Re: Opinions on Physics - Puzzles, mysteries, that sort...

The earth's gravity does not have north and south poles. The earth's magnetic field has them. This is understood! And it is also my point that gravity of the Earth by its magnetic field can be redefined as either a combination of strong and weak interactions/forces or either of them. To say Earth's...
by Aetixintro
Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:48 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson
Replies: 13
Views: 3247

Re: Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson

The earth's gravity does not have north and south poles. The earth's magnetic field has them. This is understood! And it is also my point that gravity of the Earth by its magnetic field can be redefined as either a combination of strong and weak interactions/forces or either of them. To say Earth's...
by Aetixintro
Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:00 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: what about Ether?
Replies: 48
Views: 8970

Re: what about Ether?

The earth's gravity does not have north and south poles. The earth's magnetic field has them. This is understood! And it is also my point that gravity of the Earth by its magnetic field can be redefined as either a combination of strong and weak interactions/forces or either of them. To say Earth's...
by Aetixintro
Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:55 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Why we can not see the future?
Replies: 37
Views: 7068

Re: Why we can not see the future?

"Why we can (possibly) see the future?" By the projecting faculties of the mind in the mind AND not on the sky! Just the suggestion.