Search found 595 matches
- Fri Jul 24, 2020 9:14 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
To argue being exists beyond the body and mind is not a problem, yet existence occurs through the body and mind where the body and mind exist as extensions of the "one". The various grades of being are extensions thus facets of the one. The many occurs through the one where "many-ness" is that whic...
- Fri Jul 24, 2020 1:29 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: What is gravity?
- Replies: 137
- Views: 13097
Re: What is gravity?
Gravity is a motion expressed in/as s³/t³. The three dimensions that are normally associated with space (3D) actually precedes all considerations of space and time. This means that time, like space, also has the same three dimensions. The nature of the relationship between space and time is that the...
- Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:37 am
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
False, various grades of blue necessitates the one existing through the many. There are various grades of being which necessitate various degrees of non suffering. The many conditions that satisfy 'not not unity' as unity exist as many because of (thus through) the one, not the other way around. Th...
- Thu Jul 23, 2020 11:14 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 795
Re: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
The requirement for explanation/justification is basic. What the moral-fact deniers are insisting more precisely and ideologically, there cannot be any moral-ought from any "is". The point at which I drop out is acknowledging there even is such a thing as a "moral fact" and/or "moral ought". I find...
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:07 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Not blue necessitates an infinite variety of colors stemming from it. Replace blue with unity and colors with sufferings. Regress is part of the continuum, of ignorance, yes. Two is an effect of 1 No, it is not. 1 is an effect of two. Space and time are two aspects of one reciprocity, thus space an...
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 8:23 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 795
Re: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
Point is the moral-ought-deniers like Peter Holmes et. al. insist any descriptive statement expressed by a person cannot be prescriptive at the same time. The relevance of 'speech acts' in this case is to counter the moral-ought-deniers, that there are counter examples to their absolute claim "ther...
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 7:47 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
False, not blue necessitates an infinite variety of colors which stem from it. Let blue be 1. -(-1) = 1 not (not blue) = blue "not blue" is simply -1 which implies absence of blue only thus of course a variety of colors may be present. This still results in "am-ness" as having an infinite regress o...
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 6:25 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Negation as an action of existence is a subset of existence, thus negation of all is a negation of the subset thus necessitating negation of negation. Negation is a subset of non-existence, not existence. Negation implies an object/subject to negate, hence negation of negation is nonsensical outsid...
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 11:42 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 795
Re: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
Not sure where you get the above first quote from? I cannot grasp your points precisely, but I'll try to response as accurate as possible. I got it from the OP: The concept of 'Speech Acts' is relevant to the 'Is-Ought' Problem. In Searle's derivation of 'Ought from Is' argument he relied on the co...
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: High physics died
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1251
Re: High physics died
Physics is dead-on-arrival because the mathematics used to describe is dead-on-arrival. Mathematicians still, to this day, do not know precisely how to measure a circle without "approximating" it with straight lines such to believe pi is "transcendental". https://i.postimg.cc/ncW3B6wW/1on-sml2.jpg P...
- Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:27 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 795
Re: 'Speech Acts' Relevant to 'Is-Ought' Problem.
On the other hand there is a distinction between utterances which involve claims objectively decidable as true or false and those which involve claims not objectively decidable, but which are "matters of personal decision" or "matters of opinion." True or false must be a definite condition(s), thus...
- Sat Jul 18, 2020 5:47 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
This is thesis and antithesis of the Hegelian dialectic. Alpha and Omega actually appear in the expressions describing the physical universe. One may call them anything, as again: they are a null binary satisfying any/all binaries whose relationship is that of perpetual conjugation. All conjugation...
- Fri Jul 17, 2020 2:59 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
A variable which is fixed is no longer a variable. The nature of the relation between any conjugate binary is fixed, the two aspects of the binary are relatively variable however do not change. If one is alpha, the other is omega and vice versa. This is just the thesis/antithesis dichotomy. For eve...
- Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:18 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
The change of the relative variables results in the change of the principle in question. Not all variables are relative - some are fixed. Fixed variables rely exclusively on the relationship between them, and not the variables themselves. This is how/why A and Ω may be used as a null binary satisfy...
- Sun Jul 12, 2020 8:57 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
- Replies: 151
- Views: 25909
Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
All principles are a means of interpreting a given set of relations of phenomenon. The interpretation is the relationships between a given set of variables. Change the variables and the interpretation changes. Interpretation of relations is a matter of principle, in particular: a matter of conscien...