Search found 1611 matches

by Skepdick
Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:44 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Should 'God' be taught is school? (Non religiously)
Replies: 219
Views: 1905

Re: Should 'God' be taught is school? (Non religiously)

The class is designed to teach two truths. (1: their isn't any real info about 'God(s) 2: Human beings are gullible by default, but critical thinking skills can lesson damage) to get those 15 year olds attention should be as follows: My skeptical-agnostic would immediately derail your classroom wit...
by Skepdick
Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:45 am
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings
Replies: 45
Views: 483

Re: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings

Definition of multiple 1 : consisting of, including, or involving more than one. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/multiple All binaries are multiple. All multiples are not binary. When you use the word "binary" you ought to mean "exactly 2". Mathematically it corresponds to the integer 2....
by Skepdick
Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:44 am
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings
Replies: 45
Views: 483

Re: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings

Definition of multiple 1 : consisting of, including, or involving more than one. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/multiple All binaries are multiple. All multiples are not binary. When you use the word "binary" you ought to mean "exactly 2". Mathematically it corresponds to the integer 2....
by Skepdick
Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:08 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: Do we need consciousness?
Replies: 71
Views: 634

Re: Do we need consciousness?

Testing depends on whether you believe the answer sheet or not. And where would the answers come from if you are the one putting together the question-paper? So, I can always believe that I know what I know. If what I know is true, then I know what I know. If what I know is false, then I know that ...
by Skepdick
Fri Nov 08, 2019 8:37 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Should 'God' be taught is school? (Non religiously)
Replies: 219
Views: 1905

Re: Should 'God' be taught is school? (Non religiously)

The class is designed to teach two truths. (1: their isn't any real info about 'God(s) 2: Human beings are gullible by default, but critical thinking skills can lesson damage) to get those 15 year olds attention should be as follows: My skeptical-agnostic would immediately derail your classroom wit...
by Skepdick
Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:51 am
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings
Replies: 45
Views: 483

Re: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings

Definition of multiple 1 : consisting of, including, or involving more than one. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/multiple All binaries are multiple. All multiples are not binary. When you use the word "binary" you ought to mean "exactly 2". Mathematically it corresponds to the integer 2....
by Skepdick
Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:06 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Double Negation --> P=P --> Double Positives
Replies: 28
Views: 413

Re: Intuitionist Double Negation --> Aristotelian P=P --> Double Positives

I'm not sure of your point here, as for sure if pears don't exist then its false that pears exist and the proposition "Pears exist" will be false? This is a proposition about pears: P1: Pears exist P1 is false. This is a proposition about another proposition (P1): P2: P1 is false P2 is true. https:...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 9:41 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings
Replies: 45
Views: 483

Re: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings

So two is not "multiple?" The OP says, in the argument, "binary at minimum". Binary is precisely two. At least two is 2, 3, 4, 5..... unbounded. And multiple, 2 is the grounding of multiplicity. Every set of multiple phenomenon always contains 2 minimum. OK, but binary means 2 and 2 only. "2 minimu...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:29 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Fodder 'n' Frivolities: a complaint against Spectacle Society
Replies: 25
Views: 737

Re: Fodder 'n' Frivolities: a complaint against Spectacle Society

And now I understand context sensitivity? Lol, I have been stating context for awhile. Not as long as I've been telling you to read about Type 1 Grammars ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy#Type-1_grammars ). They are also known as context -sensitive grammars. Contexts are well studie...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:22 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings
Replies: 45
Views: 483

Re: All Propositions Have Binary Meanings

Not necessarily, if I am observing binary meanings as multiple meanings through one sentence. So now you are saying that "binary meaning" is "multiple meanings". You are saying that "multiple" means 2. Because binary means 2. Strawman question the OP is about multiple meanings through one propositi...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:05 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Double Negation --> P=P --> Double Positives
Replies: 28
Views: 413

Re: Intuitionist Double Negation --> Aristotelian P=P --> Double Positives

In classical Propositional Logic(PL)(which I presume is what you're mangling) there is no 'If P exists'. The standard semantics are True and False so the formula is read as 'if P is true'. What do you mean by 'if P exists'? Propositions are types ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry%E2%80%93Howard...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:24 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: Do we need consciousness?
Replies: 71
Views: 634

Re: Do we need consciousness?

commonsense wrote:
Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:06 pm
Skepdick wrote:
Thu Nov 07, 2019 11:20 am
If you actually understood recursion you would observe the meta-epistemic problems this question poses: How do you know that you know?
...by testing what I know.
How do you test that you know what you know?

And if you are going to self-science yourself - how do you test that you don't know?
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:45 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A.I. requires human consciousness for sentience
Replies: 75
Views: 791

Re: A.I. requires human consciousness for sentience

"For/next" is a macro for recursive function. You are lying again. There are empirical (e.g measurable and testable) differences between iteration and recursion. And I am adding symbolic computation for fun also. https://repl.it/repls/FineSplendidCodec # Further revealing Zelebg's ignorance by demo...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 12:53 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A.I. requires human consciousness for sentience
Replies: 75
Views: 791

Re: A.I. requires human consciousness for sentience

Computing has nothing to do with numbers, eh? I'll just laugh and ignore that since you have taken too much of my time already. Anyhow, you were not talking about "Computer Science", I was. Are you a computer scientist? I am... Computing has nothing to do with numbers because numbers don't exist. i...
by Skepdick
Thu Nov 07, 2019 11:28 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: A.I. requires human consciousness for sentience
Replies: 75
Views: 791

Re: A.I. requires human consciousness for sentience

You are repeating yourself, and you were already told: Recursion is completely different concept in 'Recursion theory' than in 'recursive function'. Clearly then you understand neither. You are in no position to be telling anybody anything about things you don't understand. It's because I understan...