Search found 4041 matches

by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:26 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:23 pm
But I have NEVER refused to communicate with you.
Well, I asked you to define "evidence" quite a few posts back and you still haven't done it.

Your continued avoidance of addressing my clarifying question means "refusal to communicate" to me.
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:21 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:18 pm
Do you STILL have NO IDEA what 'evidence' means, to me?
How would I come to understand your meaning when you haven't communicated it yet?
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:09 pm
Forum: Applied Ethics
Topic: The Limits of Morality
Replies: 89
Views: 5798

Re: The Limits of Morality

DPMartin wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:06 pm
you don't give choice to those more powerful then you.
And who might be so powerful as to be able to come back from the dead?

Violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:07 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Expanding Universe -- Why and How We Know It Is Expanding
Replies: 217
Views: 4592

Re: The Expanding Universe -- Why and How We Know It Is Expanding

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:04 pm
'That' which can be seen with the physical eyes.
Define 'physical'
Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:04 pm
The whole quantity of a group.
Define 'whole' and 'quantity'.
Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:04 pm
But there is NO word that "NEEDS" to be defined. So, you will stop now, that is; if you are honest person.
Define 'honest'.
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:57 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

But I can. It is a VERY SIMPLE and EASY thing to do. WHY do you ASSUME and/or BELIEVE I can NOT? I neither ASSUME nor BELIEVE whether you can or can't communicate what 'evidence' is. I know that at this very moment you have failed to communicated it to me. This is an OBVIOUS TRUTH. I do NOT KNOW WH...
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:55 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:52 pm
Yes, as evidenced below.
I have no idea what you mean. You still haven't defined 'evidence'
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:48 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Expanding Universe -- Why and How We Know It Is Expanding
Replies: 217
Views: 4592

Re: The Expanding Universe -- Why and How We Know It Is Expanding

Some thing observable. Define 'observable' Any of ALL, which has NOT been given a specific name, other than the 'thing' word, obviously. Define 'ALL' Some or ALL. See above. How long are you going to ask me to define words for? Till you get to a word that doesn't need to be defined. But I do NOT fe...
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:43 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

Now you are just getting beyond ridiculous. Am I? Bringing up questions like you have here is just one of those very tiring examples, which people resort to when they have run out of ideas to back up and support their OWN assumptions and beliefs. So tell us why you BELIEVE in the universe then.
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:34 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:31 pm
WHEN you produce that, then you will KNOW what I mean by 'evidence'.
Why can't you just communicate to me what you mean by 'evidence'?

If you communicate it to me THEN I can produce it!
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:31 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: are women to blame for tyranny?
Replies: 77
Views: 2477

Re: are women to blame for tyranny?

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:29 pm
Considering you are the one asking me to define the words that YOU use, I find what you ask here more than hilarious.
Have you no shame, filthy liar?!?!

You used 'men' and 'women' first.

You asked: HOW are men and women supposedly very, VERY different creatures?
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:25 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: The Expanding Universe -- Why and How We Know It Is Expanding
Replies: 217
Views: 4592

Re: The Expanding Universe -- Why and How We Know It Is Expanding

Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 pm
Any thing of physical matter.
Define 'physical matter'.
Define 'thing'.
Define 'any'.
Age wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 pm
Whatever units you feel like using.
So tell us what units you feel like using then?
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:21 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

Non-sequitur. If you do NOT know what I am asking for, then OBVIOUSLY do NOT answer. How OBVIOUSLY SIMPLE is that? I also ONLY asked for EVIDENCE from those that SAY 'the Universe is expanding'. You would NEVER say any such thing because you have your own agenda here, and putting forward any VIEW, ...
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:20 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: are women to blame for tyranny?
Replies: 77
Views: 2477

Re: are women to blame for tyranny?

Non-sequitur. You would have to define the word 'men' first, and then define the word 'women', or vice-versa. But you are completely incapable of doing that, so any reply you give could NOT logically follow from the previous statement or question. Bullshit. Why do I have to define the words YOU are...
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:05 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

So, you KNOW how to communicate in the "RIGHT" way and say that it is done by defining ALL the words one uses. YET, you have made it clear that you use your OWN specific definitions for the words you use, and when asked for that specific definition, which you made clear you have on a particular wor...
by Logik
Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:54 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 16940

Re: Einstein on the train

But I am NOT looking for 'evidence' that resulted in just ANOTHER "theory". Once again: The only thing we know for certain is that there is some weird shit going on. Well that is one way to "cover up" proposing things as being True, but in Truth REALLY NOT knowing what IS going on. You have, in you...