Philosophy Now Forum

What are those things, which YOU are 100% certain about, that exist? Surely I don't need to enumerate each and every thing and give it a name? No you do NOT have to. Just name one will do. What is that thing which exists on the corner of your 4th toe's nail? I do NOT know what you are talking about...

Of course what YOU have said here says nothing whatsoever. Besides the fact that we both agree on this, and what have you said here says nothing whatsoever is very obvious, you have STILL FAILED to answer my question/s here. Instead you answered some completely unrelated question, that you, yoursel...

The rate that we experience changes. It is similar for all conscious being in a frame of reference and in the same gravitational force. So, again what is the "proper" rate? The rate that you experience it. Okay, if this were even remotely to be correct, then whatever rate I experience change, then ...

ALL-THERE-IS is ALL-THERE-IS. What label you assign to ALL-THERE-IS is up to you. You can call it The Universe. Or God. Or Multiverse. Or My Precious. Whatever label you give it, you still can't tell me if ALL-THERE-IS is infinite or finite. So you know nothing about it. Knowing the names of things...

Everything that is alive will eventually die because immmortality is not physically possible And so the extinction of the human species at some future point in time can be predicted Even the Universe itself shall die when it acquires heat death through maximum entropy How CERTAIN of this are you? T...

ALL-THERE-IS is ALL-THERE-IS. What label you assign to ALL-THERE-IS is up to you. You can call it The Universe. Or God. Or Multiverse. Or My Precious. Whatever label you give it, you still can't tell me if ALL-THERE-IS is infinite or finite. So you know nothing about it. Knowing the names of things...

P1. ALL-THERE-IS is the Universe, Itself. P2. If some thing exists, then C. The Universe exists. Now, we are back to my original two questions to you here; Is there any thing that you are 100% certain about that you KNOW, for sure, exists? If no, then so be it. 100% certainty doesn't solve anything...

You have perverted views. How can you seriously logically make the assumption, and then jump to a conclusion, that I have perverted views based on just the asking to you of this very simple and basic Truly OPEN clarifying question, and/or writing "okay"? You are ignorant of "we" which include yours...

What I am saying IS, you have to first prove, with evidence, that there is a 'human "mind/s" ' FIRST, before you can sprout on like you are. No, we don't. I was talking to veritas when I used the word 'you'. So, really, there was, and still is, no 'we'. You didn't use any evidence to prove the univ...

Note we are sure what a 'mind' is from the current knowledge and perspectives. Lol who is 'we'? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind In this discussion, I take "mind" to be empirical verifiable. Okay You have perverted views. How can you seriously logically make the assumption, and then jump to a con...

Nope. The above statement is explainable and conditioned* upon human mind[s]. * conditioned, thus not absolute. A human "mind[s]" HAS TO exit first BEFORE the above statement is explainable and conditioned upon it[them]. Now, define what you think or believe human 'mind[s]' is, and then if you can,...

A human "mind[s]" HAS TO exit first BEFORE the above statement is explainable and conditioned upon it[them]. Sure. That doesn't mean the universe exists. My statement had nothing whatsoever to do with if the Universe exists or does NOT exist. Now, define what you think or believe human 'mind[s]' is...

This is a violation of Cantor’s theorem. Who cares? It is a "theorem", which obviously can be falsified. No, a theorem cannot be falsified. If you say so. A theorem can be valid or invalid. A theorem either follows from the axiomatic pre-suppositions or it doesn't. This is called 'consistency' in l...

The idea of a universe that is created by a god is not empirically possible. That sounds like an absolute. Nope. The above statement is explainable and conditioned* upon human mind[s]. * conditioned, thus not absolute. A human "mind[s]" HAS TO exit first BEFORE the above statement is explainable an...

It is evil if you care to live. Yes, and that was my point. Because obviously if they did not want to live, and in fact knew they were going to die, soon enough, maybe they would like and much prefer to be put out of their misery and killed sooner than later. That is another scenario. In my scenari...