Search found 12183 matches

by Arising_uk
Sun May 10, 2020 11:49 pm
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.
Replies: 62
Views: 1950

Re: You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.

Dontaskme wrote: I love informing myself about fake news...I mean what else is there to read ?

:mrgreen: ..you might not get that joke...sigh!
Informing oneself about it may be funny, spreading it is not it just makes you a klutz.
by Arising_uk
Sun May 10, 2020 12:17 pm
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.
Replies: 62
Views: 1950

Re: You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.

Roll-up roll-up and watch the conspiracy theorists suddenly notice geo-political issues that have been occurring for decades. :roll:

"plandemic" - It was so much better when the loons could only talk to themselves in their basements or pubs.
by Arising_uk
Sun May 10, 2020 1:23 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Contradiction Between Aristotelian Logic and Newtonian Physics
Replies: 10
Views: 544

Re: Contradiction Between Aristotelian Logic and Newtonian Physics

JohnDoe, Why after all this time and repeated attempts to tell you that the "=" sign does not appear in Propositional Logic(PL) do you still keep using the symbol 'P' from PL? Why not use the Mathematical ones where it applies 'X=X'.? Maybe then you'll get some comprehension about what you talk abou...
by Arising_uk
Sat May 09, 2020 1:59 am
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.
Replies: 62
Views: 1950

Re: You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.

That comment is Off topic. ... How? The word ''classified'' is a known concept in the context it is known. So in effect, the word is it's own knowing, which makes the word to be exactly what it means. Unless it means something completely different to what the general conspired consensus says it mea...
by Arising_uk
Fri May 08, 2020 2:45 am
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: Titleless 13
Replies: 2
Views: 229

Re: Message for my dear fans

May 6, 2020 Dear livers and deaders, Time to spend some time admonishing, rebuking and mourning my dear enthusiastic fans with tiny minds permanently locked in little box prisons of ignorance, arrogance, intolerance, ego and misery. I'm never into general chit-chat, so perhaps this shouldn't be in ...
by Arising_uk
Fri May 08, 2020 2:41 am
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: Titleless 15
Replies: 11
Views: 528

Re: Analysis of "Eff the Royal We"

The proof is in the pudding, via direct experience, it's elementary and experiencial dear watson. ... If that is the case Holmes then I deduce that you are Luxin and he or you are each others sock-puppets. If I know then everyone knows. ... That may be the case for you but I know what it's like to ...
by Arising_uk
Fri May 08, 2020 2:32 am
Forum: Introduce Yourself
Topic: Titleless 17
Replies: 21
Views: 1239

Re: Luxin the wise fool is back

Everything and Nothing is two things ... No, "everything" is all things and "nothing" is no thing which as far as we can tell doesn't exist other than a thing not being present. ...but things don't communicate.... You are a thing, I am a thing in fact we are all things and we patently communicate. ...
by Arising_uk
Thu May 07, 2020 2:23 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: All Numbers are Grounded in ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)
Replies: 13
Views: 632

Re: All Numbers are Grounded in ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)

1. All numbers are grounded in the ability to quantify a phenomenon. ... Numbers are grounded upon counting as they are the symbols that replaced the objects that we used to count the objects in the world. 2. This quantification begins with basic forms. ... No, it begins with objects or things. 3. ...
by Arising_uk
Thu May 07, 2020 2:12 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: All Numbers are Grounded in ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)
Replies: 13
Views: 632

Re: All Numbers are Grounded in ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)

Ad hominem, so what. ... Well at least you've learnt something. Your inability to respond to the argument only shows you have no foot to stand on intellectually. I don't bother because most of the time your pet metaphysic makes you incapable of having a constructive discussion. My point in my recen...
by Arising_uk
Wed May 06, 2020 5:39 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: Titleless 15
Replies: 11
Views: 528

Re: Analysis of "Eff the Royal We"

Dontaskme wrote: Meaningless and pointless.
You replied to a question I asked of Luxin. How did you know his karmic desserts if you aren't him?
by Arising_uk
Wed May 06, 2020 5:38 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: All Numbers are Grounded in ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)
Replies: 13
Views: 632

Re: All Numbers are Grounded in ((0=0)=(1=1))=(x=x)

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Attack the person directly relative to personal accusations is an ad hominum. If you disagree with the argument address it directly.
Nope, go away and try again and whilst you're there try to learn how to spell it.
by Arising_uk
Wed May 06, 2020 5:36 pm
Forum: Introduce Yourself
Topic: Titleless 17
Replies: 21
Views: 1239

Re: Luxin the wise fool is back

There is nothing to understand about emptiness, except in this conception of meaning. Like I said, not a scooby. Only in your dreams. Actually this was short and rude of me. What I meant is because your metaphysic has us as nothing or just one nothing(?) then you do not appear to consider that lang...
by Arising_uk
Wed May 06, 2020 5:34 pm
Forum: Introduce Yourself
Topic: Titleless 17
Replies: 21
Views: 1239

Re: Luxin the wise fool is back

Ours.
Kerpowee!!
by Arising_uk
Wed May 06, 2020 2:34 pm
Forum: Introduce Yourself
Topic: Titleless 17
Replies: 21
Views: 1239

Re: Luxin the wise fool is back

Dontaskme wrote: Only in your dreams.
"your". Kaboom!
by Arising_uk
Wed May 06, 2020 2:33 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: Titleless 15
Replies: 11
Views: 528

Re: Analysis of "Eff the Royal We"

I am as it could well be vice versa.